My name is rita smith and on behalf of the Charles Koch Institute i like to thank you for joining us today for what promises to be a substantive and timely discussion about the applicability or lack thereof of existing legal authorities to the use of force against iran. Its great to see so many staffers here today. We are encouraged to see a full house. You guys have so much to do with the way we approach the broader matter of congressional war powers. Its encouraging to see an interested room looking to get informed by expert jurists up here today. For the sake of time and discussion im going to keep the introductions perfunctory in no small part because our panelists reputations undoubtedly precede them. To my far left Stephen Vladek is the a dalton cross professor and law at the university of texas school of law in austin. A graduate of Amherst College and yale law school. But distinction is teaching and Research Focus on federal jurisdiction, constitutional law, National Security l
Charles allen wri Stephen Vladek holds the charles rent university of texas published in the New York Times Los Angeles Times he has argued before the Circuit Court that speaks in and of itself and the Supreme Court analystt in 2013 and steven livs in austin texas. I will hand it over to them. [applause] good evening. Stephen vladek a hero in his own town and its great to be here. The first thing i want to ask is will move this conversation. There is still time. I think 20 minutes of silence is about right for a book about the supremed court decisions. It has gone better than last night actually. Are you sure you dont want to just talk about ken paxton . [applause] for an hour. I [applause] yeah. If you have not seen her for the book its terrific and thats up to it andth the book itself is e right book for this moment when its so much in the news and on our minds and well talk a lot about the Supreme Court today in the context of this book lets begin by talking about the book in defini
barrasso and democrat tim kaine. then it president biden takes economic a message to the home state of two of his 2024 rivals. quick starting here in south carolina for. talk about the progress made in building the economy for the middle out in the bottom up. not trickling down. there s nothing good about bidenomics . we can do better by trusting the american people with their own money. shannon: was former new jersey governor presidential hopeful chris christie about his plans for the economy and whether he can break out of the pack. plus. is more than just about stopping collusion it s also about stopping coercion perks federal judge box a number of biden officials and federal agencies from coordinating with big tech social media. we will ask our sunday panel held a july 4 ruling has sparked a debate over what qualifies as a free speech, censorship or misinformation. all it right now on fox news sunday . . shannon: telephone fox news in washington for preside
barrasso and democrat tim kaine. then it president biden takes economic a message to the home state of two of his 2024 rivals. quick starting here in south carolina for. talk about the progress made in building the economy for the middle out in the bottom up. not trickling down. there s nothing good about bidenomics . we can do better by trusting the american people with their own money. shannon: was former new jersey governor presidential hopeful chris christie about his plans for the economy and whether he can break out of the pack. plus. is more than just about stopping collusion it s also about stopping coercion perks federal judge box a number of biden officials and federal agencies from coordinating with big tech social media. we will ask our sunday panel held a july 4 ruling has sparked a debate over what qualifies as a free speech, censorship or misinformation. all it right now on fox news sunday . . shannon: telephone fox news in washington for preside
The assessment of the republican memo . Guest after all of that sound and fury, i think the release of the memo was a bit anticlimactic. The memo really doesnt include much beyond what was already leak doubt. There are the questions about the provenance of the steel dossier. The goal of the memo is to provide the proof that the investigation by mueller is or the Deputy Attorney general rosenstein is somehow ultimately part of this controversy. I think it failed on both accounts. Folks are still going to accept it as a Conspiracy Theory perpetuated, but the fact the conversation has moved on to other possible problems. The memo did not really do the work that i think its authors wanted to do. Host do you think it was the narrow perspective of how this fisa court words and what information it takes to get someone to be investigated under fisa . There is a lot of public misinformation about the court. But also about the war and process generally. A lot of folks look at the facts that Mich