ability to interview present employees and anybody that volunteers so, yes, there are some limitations to this report coming out today. heather: let s take a listen to this, this is carter page predicting some of what the ig evidence will be that will be classified. listen. there s been internal battle, we have to see how all that plays out. who were the russian informants that allow today get the fisa report? i don t know that we will get that, but i m hopeful as to the information we are going to get, president trump did give bar, are the ability to declassify this information and without that i think we d see a lot of blocked out black boxes, given
the authority, i think we will get a lot of information that we wouldn t have otherwise gotten directives. at the end of the day who do you think will benefit from this? i think both sides will get take aways here, certainly on all of the steele information and not telling the judges that it was paid by the dnc and the hillary clinton campaign, not telling judges that there s circular reportings, i m interested to see what they say about circular reportings and doj and fbi used same yahoo news story to almost corroborate steele in the application, also steele was terminated for leaking, when did the feds know about that, if it was in october prior to first application, that would have been in application as well. it ll be interesting. there have been a couple of leaks but as of right now no one knows for sure who is this the
investigation. it has all the hallmarks of it. his social media postings showed jihadist ideology, showed islamist bent, that s the right thing for the fbi to do and as she said, they need to find out whether he acted alone as lone wolf or part of larger network, other members of saudi leadership had anything to do with this because they ve actually allied with president trump against the islamists in saudi arabia and elsewhere, seems unlikely they re involved but could be their opposition or potentially other islamist worldwide. heather: you mentioned the possibility of other people being involved, we can pull up the information that we know about the gunman and part of the reason they are looking at other because of the second thing, he watched the mass shooting video and so they have to determine whether or not he watched those with other people also we had the possible twitter account with tweets with hatred of
oh, i think i would want to hear it. you want that kind of interference in our elections? it s not interference. they have information. i think i d take it. if i think there was something wrong i think i d go maybe to the fbi. well, so much for america first. the president telling abc yesterday he does not care where that information comes from. democrats this morning unified in their outrage. what the president said last night shows clearly once again over and over again that he does not know the difference between right and wrong, and that s probably the nicest thing i can say about him. there is no sense of, what s the word i want to find, any ethical sense that informs his comments and his thinking. republicans with few exceptions silent looking to change the subject or talking in circles. senator lindsey graham one of the exceptions. that s not the right answer. if a foreign government comes to
adversary and the uk is one of our closest allies, and this is somebody who has worked with the fbi in the past which is part of the reason which they felt probably more comfortable relying on some of this information, not for all of this investigation, but relying on some of this information as if they were moving forward. i think when you look at what the trump people were doing when it came to russia, they were accepting information or at least suggesting a willingness to accept information with a government that was openly hostile to the united states, a government that was involved in hacking. it s just a very different situation. it s like every time you did the republicans a question about donald trump they bring it back to hill him. we re not talking about the same thing here. we re not in the same univerve s conversations and if they say go look at that shiny object doesn t mean america should all follow like sheep behind it. it s because they don t want to answer a question