Business, the media, across the board, and the president since hes been in office has stoked that in an unprecedented way. The argument that theyre going to make about the fact that hes obstructing certainly matters on constitutional level but does it matter on a who cares level. This is an issue, i think the loss of institutional integrity, because our politics are tribalized and divisive, why nancy pelosi did not want to move forward with impeachment for the longest time, because it would be so divisive and she feels like her hand has been, you know, that theres no choice but to move forward. Whether its i remember during the health care debate, senator dodd said this is a really bad idea to do this on a party line vote. Doing impeachment this way is really hard because it allows one side to cast the other as seeking to legitimize them. Thats what the American People should not want because it undermines our institutions. Were going to hear from three witnesses basically at length to
well, it is particularly important for everyone, but for desantis who has so much riding on it, and he is in second place, it is elevated imp importance. when we are talking about the presidential campaign, it is a variety of campaigns in variety of states, and talking about how powerful donald trump is in the republican party, and if trump wins iowa, he is going to steam roll, and winning begets win, and then winning is momentum, and that is going to steamroll into january. so for desantis who has the money and the organization, he is essentially in the words of one adviser to move to iowa and set up unofficial residence there, and spend an unofficial disproportionate time there, and with the aid of a super pac and spent a tremendous amount of
pointing to the thing a solid 30%. a crowded republican field in a winner take all primary season he s win those. republicans, want one simple trick to stop the inevitability of donald trump being yob nominee? go to proportional representation. not at nerdy as the sounds. get a representative result. otherwise, donald trump, a number of people run, donald trump will steam roll through. what they think, anyway. an element of that fighting the last war. the only point. trump s folks make that point, too. he will be able to, him, get gooding 30% everyone else splitting the ballot, yes. i don t know what this will look like. none of us do, if he gets indicted. what it will look like if desantis gets in, desantis at all effective at a candidate. a degree to which they are refighting 2016 and when you are refighting a past campaign that s not a great position to be in. my only point. and we don t know.
three regimes. nobody wanted war. what they did is they had diplomacy and we had to resort to war. diplomacy is useless without force. please tell me in what speech do you give to the world who has lost millions of people and close to 700,000 americans specifically, where you don t bring up pandemic. never before again can we have a country hoist a virus on the world and not allow inspectors to come to do their work to find out how it started. never before should we allow a country to blow up to rip up an international treaty and steam roll hong kong like they are while threatening taiwan as we speak. never before should we again allow millions of muslims to be rounded up and put in concentration camps and use their organs to give to other people that are essentially huge beings to harvest organs to give to chinese people. never before again should we
the only country in that region of the world that alexander the great failed to conquer. it was the only country that the roman empire didn t go near because of its reputation. the british empire twice was sent out of there with its tail between its legs. the soviet empire failed. the greatest military powers the world has ever seen called america has failed. and perhaps at last, someone will understand that afghanistan you deal with them at your peril if you think you re going to conquer and occupy them. but diub , to conquer and occupy them. but digby. it s to conquer and occupy them. but digby, it s not about conquering, it s about digby, it s not about conquering, it s about supporting. i m it s about supporting. i m agreeing it s about supporting. i m agreeing with it s about supporting. i m agreeing with you, - it s about supporting. i“n agreeing with you, henry, i m agreeing with you, henry, i m agreeing with you, henry, i m agreeing with you. i m just saying that s