for france as it is for the uk? i think more resources are always going to be welcome, more patrols and equipment, but everyone here is agreed that it won t be the whole solution because of the kind of geography that we are dealing with. the last time i was out on patrol here the commander said, thanks to the uk we have the drones to spot the uk we have the drones to spot the smugglers and we can get to them quickly over the sand dunes with vehicles but smugglers often hide their boats in inaccessible places, in tickets of really high thorny shrubs that tear their uniforms and tear through skin. and that does not make for a quick or stealthy approach. so there are lots of people here on the ground who are quite glad that the plan to have british officers here observing alongside them because they think it might make it easier to explain some of the challenges they face, and it is seen as a positive sign
europe. i want to also talk about how you personally have a report with the new york times that says, quote, stealthy networks of commandoes and spies rushed to provide weapons, intelligence and training to ukraine resistance. can you tell us more? you are saying it is the united states and other allies? yes. well, shortly after russia invaded ukraine in february, the army special forces groups, which had been training with ukrainian commandoes inside ukraine moved to germany where they established a special cell. cia, since then, they have been training ukrainian commanders, they have been joined by 20 other countries, most of them in nato allies who have also been joining in to train these ukrainian commandoes who then go back to ukraine. they also have to learn, there are commandoes from several countries who are operating inside ukraine.
China has been involved in poaching and siphoning talent from the West, a so-called global recruitment strategy, to produce faster results in strengthening the country s economy and workforce and aggressively replace America s global leadership.
korea. and traveled over 600 kilometer trajectory. i m joined by will ripley in taipei. yet another missile fired by north korea, real flurry of them this year. we re learning disturbing things about this one. what s the latest? reporter: yeah, kim. you just talked about the fact that the maximum altitude of this missile was only 60 kilometers. that s less than 40 miles. it could literally be launched from a submarine along the coastline of japan, of south korea hypothetically and would fly under the radar and be essentially impossible for existing missile defense systems to shoot down or certainly very difficult. and this is the kind of missile that could be launched by surprise. that is the nature of submarine warfare, even though north korean warfares are diesel, loud, relatively easy to detect, unlike the united states nuclear submarine fleet far more silent and stealthy. one of the reasons the u.s. navy