let s listen to what he had about this last night, why he thinks that the law doesn t apply here. the statute doesn t say negligence. it says culpable negligence. and the case law interpreting that means some elementary of men s wrath, some recklessness, some act outside ordinary negligence. it s not a negligence statute, that would be a civil proceeding. that s why i thought the d.a. made a mistake and feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. i checked oklahoma case law today and got the jury instruction on it from the uniform jury instructions. it says this, the term culpable negligence refers to the omission to do something, which is a reasonably careful person would do, or the. it seems to me that this is not a trickly phrase man slaughter statute at all. that jury instruction seems
last night about the culpable negligence, which is part of the second degree man slaughter charge. let s listen to what he had about this last night, why he thinks that the law doesn t apply here. the statute doesn t say negligence. it says culpable negligence. and the case law interpreting that means some elementary of men s wrath, some recklessness some act outside ordinary negligence. it s not a negligence statute, that would be a civil proceeding. that s why i thought the d.a. made a mistake inand feeling the pressure from the media to charge this man. i checked oklahoma case law today and got the jury instruction on it from the uniform jury instructions. it says this the term culpable negligence refers to the omission to do something which is a reasonably careful person would do or the lack. it seems to me that this is not