really have en a answer to that. isn t it amazing no one has an answer and no one has probed what the answer is? sadly i m the only one who could call myself a matter to caylee. in she didn t do it, who did? well, i think casey. why do you say that. no other person saw her anywhere else other than having caylee and simply not having her. what was her motive? first of all, was she a good mother? absolutely. i want to make that point because i have been pilleried by various media who have been jamming at me because i say that there is not a lot of evidence she was a negligent mother or abusive mother. the child was well-cared for. did case love caylee? absolutely. i agree with you there was no neglect and there was what no
charge. they could have come back with first degree and if they were not going to give her the death penalty. so it s silly. but, mark i think people are trying to defend the jury and hit the prosecution. i m not trying to defend the jury, mark, whatsoever. you are not. they had evidence. i m saying strategically speaking this is not how i would have ride to case and plenty of people grow. i don t blame the jury. they had the evidence they did and i respect injure verdicts. nevertheless, i m going to say that what they did was right. the evidence was there. what in a lie would a 53-year-old woman, cindy anthony, who has led a hellish life since that june, should she be held accountable? i don t know. i don t care. listen, i don t approve what she did and certainly would set an example for family members not to get on the stand and lie, but she has gone through hell. but the thing is we are seeing her monday morning quarterbacking saying if the
a controversial figure. he may be a good researcher, but he presented evidence that has no forensic validity. and what about the fact that no dna was found? there was no human tissue of any kind on that duct tape, was there? nothing that i could identify. doctor, you pointed out when we spoke to you, the duct tape didn t have any dna evidence. it didn t have dna, but it had fibers on it. clothing fibers which were never examined by the fbi or the prosecutor to see where the fibers came from. as far as the child being suffocated with a never-before used form of chloroform and duct tape, did the prosecution overreach by asserting their theory was fact? they said we got the accidental drowning in the pool. we couldn t get the floor form and the duct tape. how could you come to a
for your headlines log on to fox news.com. now back to gerao at large. you have chemistry slash chloroform, how many times was that place visited? according to the history, 84 times. the website is www.fci.slash chemistry slash chloroform.htm. how many times does it show that website was visited? once, sir. i would like to show you state s evidence 166. what is this item. it is the report from cash back. and the report from cash back shows that it was visited how many times? eighty four. there s a difference between the two, is there not? that is correct. what was your initial
woodstock with a boyfriend and you don t hear from her? well, you should report it. why won you? i don t understand the fight. why wouldn t you think the law is good? it s pathetic when you think that we have to have a law like this, that parents aren t smart enough to report kids missing, like casey anthony, who did what she did. it s not about this, but before you do, you have been twitter, and what do they say? well, you are doing better than you have andrew, and they say, yeah. you think she s a good mother? figure that one out. you think she s a good mother. show me the evidence she went from being a loving, wonderful, caring mother. be as sarcastic as you want. there s no one witness.