first degree and if they were not going to give her the death penalty. so it s silly. but, mark i think people are trying to defend the jury and hit the prosecution. i m not trying to defend the jury, mark, whatsoever. you are not. they had evidence. i m saying strategically speaking this is not how i would have ride to case and plenty of people grow. i don t blame the jury. they had the evidence they did and i respect injure verdicts. nevertheless, i m going to say that what they did was right. the evidence was there. what in a lie would a 53-year-old woman, cindy anthony, who has led a hellish life since that june, should she be held accountable? i don t know. i don t care. listen, i don t approve what she did and certainly would set an example for family members not to get on the stand and lie, but she has gone through hell. but the thing is we are seeing her monday morning quarterbacking saying if the prosecution hadn t overcharged
charge. they could have come back with first degree and if they were not going to give her the death penalty. so it s silly. but, mark i think people are trying to defend the jury and hit the prosecution. i m not trying to defend the jury, mark, whatsoever. you are not. they had evidence. i m saying strategically speaking this is not how i would have ride to case and plenty of people grow. i don t blame the jury. they had the evidence they did and i respect injure verdicts. nevertheless, i m going to say that what they did was right. the evidence was there. what in a lie would a 53-year-old woman, cindy anthony, who has led a hellish life since that june, should she be held accountable? i don t know. i don t care. listen, i don t approve what she did and certainly would set an example for family members not to get on the stand and lie, but she has gone through hell. but the thing is we are seeing her monday morning quarterbacking saying if the
this evidence, this junk, that doesn t even work? it s blood money. plant it on caylee s grave. he comes up with this chloroform in their opening statement and then they don t know what to believe and cindy doesn t tell the truth. justice for caylee. will caylee s law work? kimberly? i think if it helps in even saving one child s life then it s the right thing to have on the books. i don t think it will be abused. prosecutors will use their discretion. good parents won t be prosecuted. bad parents like casey anthony will. if it protects a child, then we should have it. 24 hours? twenty four hours, i think that s reasonable. twenty four hours would have made all the difference in the world. what if your child goes to
it safely out of the way. i m patty, now back to geraldo at large. you have chemistry slash chloroform, how many times was that place visited? according to the history, 84 times. the website is www.fci.slash chemistry slash chloroform.htm. how many times does it show that website was visited? once, sir. i would like to show you state s evidence 166. what is this item. it is the report from cash back. and the report from cash back shows that it was visited how many times? eighty four. there s a difference between the two, is there not? that is correct. what was your initial
how can they come forward with this evidence, this junk, that doesn t even work? it s blood money. plant it on caylee s grave. he comes up with this chloroform in their opening statement and then they don t know what to believe and cindy doesn t tell the truth. justice for caylee. will caylee s law work? kimberly? i think if it helps in even saving one child s life then it s the right thing to have on the books. i don t think it will be abused. prosecutors will use their discretion. good parents won t be prosecuted. bad parents like casey anthony will. if it protects a child, then we should have it. 24 hours? twenty four hours, i think that s reasonable. twenty four hours would have made all the difference in the world. what if your child goes to