Amb. Anatov it is a great honor for me to be here. I would like to thank the council for this opportunity to be with you. Important to discuss a very burning issue, what should we do together . Do we need each other . Are we partners . Re enemies . Who we are, the United States and the Russian Federation . Blame anyone for the Current Situation in russianamerican relations, but today is the First Official remarks by me as an ambassador for the Russian Federation to the United States. [applause] amb. Anatov i am not a magician. Killing inou to stop chechnya. Stop killing gay people in chechnya. People left alone in chechnya. We need to protect gay people. Stop killing gay chechnya ands. Chechnyans. Gay chechens. Stop killing gay chechens. Stop killing gay chechens. Stop killing gay chechens. [crowd noise] amb. Anatov you can see our relations are complicated. It seems to me everybody has the right to explain what he wants. Sees then see how he Current Situation. It seems to me i also ha
Who we are, the United States and the Russian Federation . I dont want to blame anyone for the Current Situation in russianamerican relations, but today is the First Official remarks by me as an ambassador for the Russian Federation to the United States. [applause] amb. Antonov i am not a magician. I want you to stop killing in chechnya. Stop killing gay people in chechnya. I want gay people left alone in chechnya. We need to protect gay people. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. [applause] [crowd noise] amb. Antonov you can see our relations are complicated. It seems to me everybody has the right to explain what he wants. How he can see how he sees the Current Situation. It seems to me i also have the right to convey a few remarks to you, trying to explain how we in the Russian Federation understand the Current Situation in russianamerican relations. I would like to explain to you how we understand the im
California. Amb. Antonov thank you very much. It is a great honor to be here. I would like to thank the world u. S. Counsel for this opportunity and it is very important to discuss a burning issue. Together, doe do we need each other . Are we partners . Are we enemies . Who we are, the u. S. And the Russian Federation. On . I dont want to blame anyone for the Current Situation in russianamerican relations, but today is the First Official remarks by me as an ambassador for the Russian Federation to the United States. [applause] amb. Antonov i am not a magician. I want you to stop killing in chechnya. Stop killing gay people in chechnya. I want gay people left alone in chechnya. We need to protect gay people. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. Stop killing gay chechnyans. [applause] [crowd noise] amb. Antonov you can see our relations are complicated. It seems to me everybody has the right to explain what he wants. How he can see how he
I dont think they heard me. I dont think they heard me. I said all the people screaming your name out is out there today. Thats what i thought i heard. I would be happy, too. I would be happy too. Now let me try to restore a little order because i be excited myself if i said in a stance and a be more excited said in a seat. If i was getting ready to get my degree i would ask the speaker to do just a few things. Give me a little pieces of the puzzle and then go sit down and shut up. [laughter] i knew it so let me just you know give you my three pieces to the life puzzle. The first piece i think is applicable to all of us is simply failure is not final if they refuse to quit. I want to send one more time because i think it is absolutely unequivocally important to empathize emphasized the simple fact that failure is not final if you refuse to quicker i was thinking back during president evans introduction of how i basically flunked out of high school as a freshman to i remember those days
Individuals without a warrant and it led to the enactment of title iii, the Supreme Court ruled that for an intelligence surveillance, it had to be individualized. Third point, smith is different from this case from a lot of reasons. It is not just the government is acquiring certain types of information. Its not that the government is acquiring information about millions of individuals and not just one, but it is also that it acquiring information definitely and not made clear a few years after smith that when the government scales up a surveillance operation, the constitutional balance is different and needs to be addressed differently. Judge, you were exactly right. That the court is to assess the expectations of privacy of this program and not just what the Supreme Court decided. A quick related point. The minimization procedures would be constitutionally superfluous. If smith governed this case, they could collect the records without any of those protections in place and they coul