yes, sir. you were pretty emotional at that statement weren t you? yes, sir. was it hard for you to talk about this? yes, sir. and in that statement you as best you could attempted to tell what you remembered? i m objecting now, this is a series of leading questions. we are going to take a break from this. we are going to listen to senator marco rubio in what is being called his closing remarks ahead of the vote of what may be a historic vote on immigration reform. some feel he is putting his political career on the line. they are about to cut off debate on the bill and here is the senator. with limited education and no connections. they sust coujust could pt.
representative witnesses clothing. she said zimmerman was on top and said on cross because she had seen travon s picture later and realized that the bigger guy was on top. so that picture was when he was 12 years old but another neighbor was standing closer to them. the reason they brought that out, that neighbor whose last name was good, gave a statement saying that zimmerman was on the bottom and travon was beating him mma style. he sees zimmerman on the bottom. and they are going to have testimony that mr. zimmerman s back of his clothing was wet and covered in grass. and travon martin s front of his knees where he would have been
you were also asked about numerous questions about the interview that you gave me, the statement you gave me when i went down to in terms of whether an investigate or down in miami is that correct? yes, sir. and mr. west asked you about the fact that the state attorney s office had been appointed by the government correct? yes, sir. in terms of you found out that we were handling the case. yes, sir. and you agreed to speak to me is that correct? yes, sir. and in fact, as you stated two cars went to a place where you were at, at a friend s house and picked you up to take a statement correct?
it is normal to have some but these are major. these are huge. leaving out details like he told me he shot him. now i remember. i left it out in my last statement. when you add in there the spector that has been surrounding this case. remember the hearing, there was the attorney who took a leave of absence he said in his opinion the state attorney s office had a 500 page report of the contents of travon martin ez phone and pretended to turn it over. that is why the defense attorney was so mad. saying there were all of these pictures on the cell phone and they weren t given to me. are they still arguing with the judge? and rightfully furious. the only reason the hearing was
word bump. objection. i guess i don t quite understand what is going on here. is this confronting the witness with her prior statement that he was present for? what is the objection? it s leading and improper impeachment and if anything it is bolstering by a supposeded prior consistent statement. over ruled on all three. do you recall using the word bump in describing what occurred to travon martin? yes, sir. for the record, do you still live mr. west asked you about meeting with vindividuals in miami. you still live in miami is that