videos on chinese social media claiming the pandas are being abused went viral against the backdrop of growing anti-american sentiment. the rumors often fanned by state propaganda. chinese social media users are praising these viral videos of this panda in russia, claiming videos of the active and playful panda prove russia is taking excellent care of the chinese bear. state tv saying they are helping the russia/china development. chinese and american scientists launched a joint investigation concluding she has a fur and skin condition that does not impact her quality of life and has received excellent care. but that message is not getting through. outside the panda exhibit at the beijing zoo, i asked people if they have heard of ya-ya? this man says, yes, she s abused in america. an 11-year-old boy tells me, i heard the u.s. is treating the
that are then injected into the public bloodstream all over the world. china can t do that because its media outlets are too top down, too turgid and too propagandistic, other than xinhua. yuen, what is your analysis of how china and russia s compare? i think russia is quite a lot behind russia when it comes to disinformation. and that s because of the difference, i would argue, between state propaganda on one hand, which the chinese state media machine is set up to do, and disinformation where state propaganda is where you have the platform, you ave the whole stage, the microphone, you re telling everyone through the loudspeakers what you want people to believe and all you need to do is to repeat that many times. disinformation is a bit harder in some ways because you need to enter into a pre existing conversation. so in the case thatjoshua is giving, you need to understand the role of the us commentators and the role of conspiracy
obvious today or aljazeera which other obvious authoritarian state media obvious authoritarian state media outlets, other than,. media outlets, other than, . .. russia media outlets, other than,. russia today at its peak was great russia today at its peak was great at russia today at its peak was great at encouraging wild conspiracy theories that are then conspiracy theories that are then injected into the public bloodstream all over the world. china bloodstream all over the world. china can t bloodstream all over the world. china can t do that because it is media china can t do that because it is media outlets are too top down, too turgid and too, other top down, too turgid and too, other than top down, too turgid and too, other than chinois. top-down, too turgid and too, other than chinois. other than chinois. what is our other than chinois. what is your analysis other than chinois. what is your analysis of other than chinois. what is your analysis of how - othe
china can t do that because its media outlets are too top down, too turgid and too propagandistic, other than xinhua. yuen, what is your analysis of how china and russia s compare? i think russia is quite a lot behind russia when it comes to disinformation. and that s because of the difference, i would argue, between state propaganda on one hand, which the chinese state media machine is set up to do, and disinformation where state propaganda is where you have the platform, you ave the whole stage, the microphone, you re telling everyone through the loudspeakers what you want people to believe and all you need to do is to repeat that many times. disinformation is a bit harder in some ways because you need to enter into a pre existing conversation. so in the case thatjoshua is giving, you need to understand the role of the us commentators and the role of conspiracy theories on the far right and where this might play into an overlap with your own interests,
was great at encouraging wild conspiracy theories, - that it injected into the public bloodstream all over the world. china cannot do that, because its media outlets are too top down, too turgid and too - propagandistic, other than xinhua. yuan, what is your analysis of how china and russia s approaches compare? i think china s quite a way behind russia. as other guests have said, when it comes to disinformation. that is because of the difference, i would argue, between state propaganda, on the one hand, which the chinese state media machine is set up to do, and disinformation, where state propaganda is where you have the platform, you have the whole stage, you have the microphone, you are telling everyone through loudspeakers what you want people to believe and all you can do, all you need to do is repeat that many times. disinformation is a bit harder in some ways, because you need to enter into a pre existing conversation. so, in the case thatjoshua is giving, you need to understa