refused to design wedding websites for couples who are gay. now, even though the law requires her and her business to serve everyone equally, she argued that the law was forcing her to advance a message she does not believe in. and the conservatives on the supreme court agreed with her. they ruled that this woman had the right to discriminate against same-sex couples solely based on their sexual orientation. and already, it is case the one with the web designer is paving the way for others who challenge not just the right for gay couples to hire a web designer, but exactly what clarence thomas encouraged last year, who challenged whether gay couples can get married at all. in 2019, a justice of the piece from waco, in texas, was given a public warning after she refused to perform gay marriages. after receiving that warning, she sued the state panel that sanctions are, saying they violated the free exercise of her religion. that case has been making its way through the courts every
and the conservatives on the supreme court agreed with her. they ruled that this woman had the right to discriminate against same-sex couples solely based on their sexual orientation. and already, it is case the one with the web designer is paving the way for others who challenge not just the right for gay couples to hire a web designer, but exactly what clarence thomas encouraged last year, who challenged whether gay couples can get married at all. in 2019, a justice of the piece from waco, in texas, was given a public warning after she refused to perform gay marriages. after receiving that warning, she sued the state panel that sanctions are, saying they violated the free exercise of her religion. that case has been making its way through the courts every since. and now, given the recent ruling from this conservative supreme court, this judge seems to have a stronger legal leg to stand on then she did when she first brought this case back in 2019. the justice of the peace has fil