antiquated this personal e-mail system that the state department e-mail system is and it would be better to use personal e-mail and also maybe the time for her to write an op-ed about it. we had judge andrew napolitano on earlier and he said that that e-mail exchange indicates an awareness of guilt. this is not good for hillary clinton using the state department at the time. you know, i think hillary clinton was a great secretary of state. and she was a fabulous boss. and i sent her a lot of e-mails about work/family balance. which is what i d love to talk about. we want to get to your book and it is incredible. great. just matter of fact, her trust numbers are down in a recent dump of e-mails coming not a great thing for her. moving on to not being able to have it all. because you might be a great example of this. your book is fantastic called unfinished business: women, men, work, family. it is really about how you can t have it all and there are some things that we can do
defined by federal law. the problem here is she didn t wanted her bosses at white house to know what she was writing about, it is perceived. so she had her own server, which is against protocol. her spoke people and she herself said it wasn t classified at the time. that ignores how the process works. the reason you use the state department e-mail system so it is vetted before you hit send. he s probably going to argue because the phrase top secret was not stamped on each document, it wasn t top secret. that s not what the law says. before every person in the federal government from president to file clerk get ace national security clearance, they have a 30 minute in person interview with an fbi agent t that explains if there s doubt about whether it s classified or not, it s classified. let me add this thing. it was never classified because she never submitted it.
doing, this how they got in through the state department and the kinds of things they saw, including the president s schedule and other sensitive things wolf. because we interviewed ben rhodes the white house deputy national security adviser in the last hour. he really didn t want to get into a lot of the details specifically. he didn t want to specifically say that russia was responsible for this hack. but that s your information. that s what you learned? that s right. you know there s a lot of sensitivity with the government right now because of the threat from russia. they don t really know what to do with it and it s something that took them by surprise. when this attack first took place against the state department i was told that officials looked at it as you know the russians owning the state department e-mail system because they were all through it and despite, you know maybe efforts to try to get them out of the system, it took forever and they still don t know whether the
on any potential nuclear deal with iran. they said that that would be more appropriate than this open letter though the white house has threatened to veto any such law. john and christine? michelle thank you for that. federal officials say the hacking of the state department e-mail system over the past year is the worst ever against a government agency. according to investigators, russian hackers suspected of breaching state department computers are also behind cyber attacks targeting the white house and other federal agencies. back in november state department officials shut down the e-mail system over a weekend in an effort to bolster cybersecurity. new this morning, a departure in ferguson missouri. the city council voted unanimously to accept the resignation of city manager johnn shaw shaw. he was cited in the scathing justice department that detailed racial bias in the ferguson police department and really the entire town system including the court system. shaw supervised al
cheating. he also said that the u.s. can t be relied on when it comes to agreements like this one, especially if they re going to be revoked once a new administration is in office. now, of course that s not the opinion of everybody here. the foreign minister of course said he believes that the gop letter will have absolutely no influence on the nuclear negotiations. however, we also have to keep in mind that the nuclear deal is something that s hotly discussed here in iran as well. there are many political hard-liners, religious hard-liners, who say they don t want a deal. they feel that iran should have walked away from the negotiating table a long time ago. and of course right now they re capitalizing on what s going on in washington and saying listen we told you this all the time the u.s. is not serious about these negotiations. however, if you talk to ordinary iranians they ll tell you, of course they want a deal. and of course they want sanctions relief as fast as possible. john a