joining us daniel sanger. good to be back with you. in terms of the attribution first, what can you tell us about the administration s investigation into this, how confident that they are that it is the north korean government and how confident we should be in that assessment? a very good question because attribution is always a very difficult thing to do. you think about this summer when president obama was told that it was russia that was behind the attacks on jpmorgan chase, which were less severe than this one. and it turns out now there are a lot of people that have doubts about that. we still haven t quite gotten to the bottom of those attacks on the white house and state department unclassified computer systems. but in the case of north korea, there is much more confidence in the intelligence officials and other officials i m talking to and that my colleague has been talking to what were the basis of that article that you just mentioned. the reasons for that could be varie
justice and we re considering a wave of options in weighing that response. that just out from the national security council in the last couple of minutes. joining us daniel sanger. good to be back with you. in terms of the attribution first, what can you tell us about the administration s investigation into this, how confident that they are that it is the north korean government and how confident we should be in that assessment? a very good question because attribution is always a very difficult thing to do. you think about this summer when president obama was told that it was russia that was behind the attacks on jpmorgan chase, which were less severe than this one. and it turns out now there are a lot of people that have doubts about that. we still haven t quite gotten to the bottom of those attacks on the white house and state department unclassified computer systems. but in the case of north korea, there is much more confidence in
tirelessly to bring the perpetrators of this attack to justice and we re considering a wave of options in weighing that response. that just out from the national security council in the last couple of minutes. joining us daniel sanger. good to be back with you. in terms of the attribution first, what can you tell us about the administration s investigation into this, how confident that they are that it is the north korean government and how confident we should be in that assessment? a very good question because attribution is always a very difficult thing to do. you think about this summer when president obama was told that it was russia that was behind the attacks on jpmorgan chase, which were less severe than this one. and it turns out now there are a lot of people that have doubts about that. we still haven t quite gotten to the bottom of those attacks on the white house and state department unclassified computer systems. but in the case of north korea,