good morning. it is saturday, february 10th. you re watching velshi on msnbc. i m charles coleman junior filling in for my friend and colleague, ali velshi. we have got a lot to talk about. we begin this morning with donald trump s new reality tv show. we all remember the apprentice. the whole, you re fired, thing? what we are watching now is more like, the defendant. a terrifying real-life spinoff series played out in actual courtrooms and along the campaign trail each and every day. talk about reality tv. the stakes in this game show are, quite literally, american democracy and the rule of law. let s be clear, no one is watching it as their, quote on quote, guilty pleasure. everyone is watching. this week s episode contained plot twist, new characters, and twist that left us all wondering what is happening next. let s discuss. donald trump has not had many good days in court in the last two years. for the guy who wants infamously predicted we will get tired of so much winni
is. any given moment gaffes, literal, physical, fools and other embarrassing moments have plagued joe biden forlause] more than half of the women in my administration are women . oh, we ll talk about the strength of the dollar right now. all pretty toe curling, as we might say, across the pond.curln it does seem, though, that biden s party may have finally had enoughy ha top democrats are having quiet conversations on the sidelines on who could replace him on the democratic ticket. that s according to a stunning new reporon who could cnn sources have toldce the network that the physically demanding campaign trail c will only accentuate biden s age to voterll s. president also lags in fundraising, his campaign often raising just a few hundred a few thousand dollars from grassroots emailews. when president biden announced his third run for the presidency, he promisethirdd would be a bridge to the next generation of democrats. but now, according to many of these operatives who
right now on early start, americans are lined up outside the supreme court to witness the biggest presidential election case since bush v. gore almost a quarter century ago. plus round two here. otherwise we re getting nothing on the border. two big republican priorities go down in flames in the same week. when can congress get its act together. and foul play, the new nikki haley campaign ad that called donald trump chicken. good morning to our viewers in the united states and around the world. i m kasie hunt. it is thursday, february 8, 5:00 a.m. on an historic day in washington. the supreme court will consider a question that has never before been asked. did donald trump engage in insurrection and if so does that allow him to be disqualified from the ballot before the justices answer has the potential to upend the 2024 race. trump is now for all intents and purposes the presumptive nominee and that is exactly how his party is acting. following his lead congressi
will: plus, south dakota governor with kristi noem signs second chance legislation to allow the formerly incarcerated to work in the trades, and she s going to join us live. rachel: looking forward to that. and the big game is tomorrow, but we re not talking about the super bowl. team fluff and team [laughter] are friend for the 2024 puppy bowl. these little guys are in the green room with my daughter margarita, and they re going to join us for a warmup as the final hour of fox & friends and puppies start thes right now. it s fine by me if you never leave will: that s a nice little, upbeat song which i ve never heard in my life. you know that? rachel: no, but i do now. will: i thought you were going to break into more of that. rachel: we have so much going on, puppies in the green room, barbecue, flower contests. by the way, i asked the florist how business was going, and they said blooming. [laughter] although they did say people who were making $100 orders are now
just say, your point is that there s no ambiguity with having a list and not having president in it with having a history that suggests they were really focussed on local concerns in the south, with this conversation where the legislators actually discussed what looked like an ambiguity, you are saying there s no ambiguity in section 3? let me take the point specifically about electors and senators, if i might. yes. that might be important. presidential electors were not covered, because they don t hold an office. they vote. i m talking about the barred office part of this. exactly. the barred if you want to include everybody, first you have to suppress phi presidential electors. they wouldn t fall under any office. secretary of all, senators and representatives don t hold office either. the constitution tells us that and refers to them as holding seats, not offices. you want to make sure there s no doubt that senators and representatives are covered given the con