he is, for the first time ever he is finding himself in a position where this is an aren that he has no control over. his status does not matter where the people who are responsible for making decisions about his very freedom, he has no ability t influence. and that is a scary place fo him to be, given everythin that he knows he has done. if you look at everything that has happened before now, he ha not faced real consequences, and he is not even really been in a court of law. the mueller probe, nothing - respectfully he couldn t be charged. no consequences indictment number one, n consequences indictment number two, n consequences so this is not been real for him until today. which is why it was not surprise to hear one of the nb producers who is in there an around tell us over the phon that, when he was booked, he said you are really going to arrest me?
your name for an election, and you would think that you would say i want a speedy tria because i m not guilty of this and i am going to call their bluff. well, he is not doing that i wonder why on a change of venue, it is no going to happen. this is the jeffrey skilling case it is true - and enron exactly it is treated that if you ar in one location where it i saturated and you cannot get a fair trial, there is a lot - where you are likely to have cooler heads and ron was a case where a court said, where are you goin to go? the entire country has heard
in wisconsin, women had not had access to abortion in thei home state since last year what does this election mean for them even before the dobbs rulin there were only three where one can get an abortio there are quite a fe restrictions that had alread been passed over the las decade or so, decade plu really so access was already limite but we went from very limite access to no access at all , to going back to a band that was passed in 1840, nine les than a year after wisconsi became a state where you could not get an abortion with any exceptions but for if the life of the mother is in danger, an that was defined very vaguely. so, it is pretty much all bu certain that the legal challenge to that ban is going to be coming to the stat supreme court and having a
to choose their next state supreme court justice, eithe liberal or conservative dan kelly. at the election could determin the fate of abortion access to the millions of women in wisconsin and potentiall impact gop control in the stat capital. joining me now to discuss from madison, wisconsin just th opinion, capitol bureau chie for the capitol times. jesse, explain this to us. why is this race so importan to wisconsin thank you for having me stephanie. this is a huge race and it i the first possibility that the liberals have had in wisconsin to have a majority on our stat supreme court since 2008 as you mentioned that has to d with control of the legislatur but more prominently at this point and more likely to com up sooner s wisconsin has an abortion ban since 1849, i hasn t been forceable under ro v. wade. and after the dobbs decision it - it had does not have a exception for rape or incest it only has an exception for
important election of the year wisconsin voters will be heading to the polls tomorro to choose their next state supreme court justice, eithe liberal janet protasiewicz or conservative dan kelly. and the election could determine the fate of abortion access to the millions of wome in wisconsin and potentially impact gop control in the stat capital. joining me now to discuss from madison, wisconsin is jessie opoien, capitol bureau chief for the capitol times. jesse, explain this to us. why is this race so importan to wisconsin thank you for having me stephanie. this is a huge race and it i the first possibility that the liberals have had in wisconsin to have a majority on our stat supreme court since 2008 as you mentioned that has to d