the inner circle of the president primarily male. i think an issue here with the cabinet positions typically people look at the top four cabinet positions as the most prominent and powerful and seeing white men to take over the posts, holder looks like he will stay at least for some time period and perhaps janet napolitano will take over that position but when you have had a campaign from the president that was very much centered on women, to now come in to his second term where there seems to be a dearth of women, i think it s concerning. and not just the campaign but the people moved by the president s message. i was there with the exit polling numbers and the big message was, it s the republicans. you can t be all white male. the world is blended now. what do you make of this? is there a problem or are our eyes deceiving? today on morning joe we had a stat sheet saying that the president, 38% of his
well, it s time, if mike florio s here, you know the football season is here. to talk about sports. the first week of the regular nfl season. the founder of profootball.com, host of pro football talk on nbc sported network. welcome back. it is great to be back with you guys. it means good things. very exciting. let s talk first last night, the sunday night game on nfl with the great al michaels on the call. we love al michaels. the guy is a progressive, but we like him. peyton manning. there were some questions, could he still play with the neck? i think he answered most of those last night. and there are still some issues. he doesn t have his full arm strength. his brain is 100%, always has been. he stays within his limitations. this goes into the stat sheet as a long throw. he knows how to get guys in the right position. he knows how to find the open man and beat the steelers at home. what a leader. i don t think they re going to regret it yet in indianapolis, but
i don t think you disenfranchise. the most important system we have is the people s right to vote. here s a situation where all we re saying is you need identification to vote. i don t think that s a weird idea or a crazy idea. it s probably it s what most americans think is the right thing to do to protect the system. and the arguments that somehow it s done for suppression, to me, that s someone who simply wants to argue that to vote is important, you should have identification. that s what the important factor is. i m the one who is going to take the other argument because you have to be kidding me. if i m sitting on the bench and somebody comes in and you re looking at a stat sheet. what s the problem? no evidence of rampant voter fraud. none anywhere. we have had these conversations before. the bush administration working as hard as they could came up with about 32 cases over an eight-year period. secondarially, what s the remedy? we want a picture id? how hard is it for any
voters? i don t think you disenfranchise. the most important system we have is the people s right to vote. here s a situation where all we re saying is you need identification to vote. i don t think that s a weird idea or a crazy idea. it s probably it s what most americans think is the right thing to do to protect the system. and the arguments that somehow it s done for suppression, to me, that s someone who simply wants to argue that to vote is important, you should have identification. that s what the important factor is. i m the one who is going to take the other argument because you have to be kidding me. if i m sitting on the bench and somebody comes in and you re looking at a stat sheet. what s the problem? no evidence of rampant voter fraud. none anywhere. we have had these conversations before. the bush administration working as hard as they could came up with about 32 cases over an eight-year period. secondarially, what s the remedy? we want a picture id? how hard is it
about voter fraud. ufo sightings are more common than cases of voter fraud. why risk disenfranchising voters? i don t think you disenfranchise. the most important system we have is the people s right to vote. here s a situation where all we re saying is you need identification to vote. i don t think that s a weird idea or a crazy idea. it s probably it s what most americans think is the right thing to do to protect the system. and the arguments that somehow it s done for suppression, to me, that s someone who simply wants to argue that to vote is important, you should have identification. that s what the important factor is. i m the one who is going to take the other argument because you have to be kidding me. if i m sitting on the bench and somebody comes in and you re looking at a stat sheet. what s the problem?