it wouldn t be to ukraine s benefit. vindman insisting that he believed that the order was wrong. congressman zeldin claiming to cnn that the source s description was untrue and doubling down on the gop s focus on process over substance, saying that the hearings should be televised. they should be televised live. like i said, better be careful what you wish for. the house holding its first vote to formalize the impeachment inquiry tomorrow, so look for that. democrats say open hearings could begin before thanksgiving. so how are other republicans responding to the president s demand that they defend him with substance? well, they re pretty much avoiding talking about the president s so-called perfect call with ukraine and doubling down on, you guessed it, complaining about the process. no due process now. maybe some later but only if we feel like it. this has been an unfair process. speaker pelosi needs to end this infatuation with impeachment. it s a star chamber-type
impeachment of president trump is out of bounds, is inconsistent with due process as we know it, is a star chamber-type inquiry and is a substantial deviation from what the house has done in the past regarding impeachment of other presidents. first, graham was active in the clinton impeachment. he never criticized starr then. nor the fact that that probe started with a real estate transaction and ended with a sex act. the ugly part is that senator supercilious has to know that his argument is b.s. why? he knows that with nixon and clinton lawmakers weren t doing the investigating. it was an independent counsel or a special prosecutor who both used closed-door depositions. and in clinton graham was then party to a second layer of secrecy. lead prosecutor henry hyde said tuesday that two days of closed
the purpose of a resolution is to let the house know that the process you re engaging in regarding the attempted impeachment of president trump is out of bounds, is inconsistent with due process as we know it. it s a star chamber type inquiry and it s a substantial deviation from what the house has done in the past regarding impeachment of other presidents. first, graham was active in the clinton impeachment. he never criticized starr then nor the fact that that probe started with a real estate transaction and ended with a sex act. the ugly part is that senator has to know that his argument is bs. why? he knows that with nixon and clinton lawmakers weren t doing the investigating, it was an independent counsel or special prosecutor who both used closed