Latest Breaking News On - Stansfield smith - Page 7 : comparemela.com

US Trying to Extradite Venezuelan Diplomat for the Crime of Securing Food for the Hungry: The Case of Alex Saab v The Empire

US Trying to Extradite Venezuelan Diplomat for the ‘Crime’ of Securing Food for the Hungry: The Case of Alex Saab v. The Empire (Image by twitter) The case of Alex Saab raises dangerous precedents in terms of extraterritorial judicial abuse, violation of diplomatic status, and even the use of torture to extract false confessions. This is according to Montréal-based international human rights lawyer John Philpot. He spoke on May 19 at a webinar sponsored by the Alliance for Global Justice and other groups about this example of the long reach of the US empire enforcing its deadly sanctions on some one third of humanity.

Guinea bissauUnited statesUnited kingdomCabo verdeGuinea bissau generalDistrito federalSaudi arabiaNorth koreaNorth koreanNancy hollanderCruz almeidaWilliam camacaroMeng wanzhouAlberto lovera bolivarianJuan guaidIndhriana parada

U S Sanctions Violate International Law, Imprison Foreign Citizens

SUBSCRIBE to EIR Daily Alert Service U.S. Sanctions Violate International Law, Imprison Foreign Citizens May 1, 2021 (EIRNS) “The United States uses economic sanctions as a weapon,” writes Stansfield Smith in a powerful Grayzone exposé on April 28. They are a weapon of war against civilians, capable of destroying an economy by causing hyperinflation and unemployment, preventing import of necessities, and driving away investment. According to the United Nations, unilateral U.S. sanctions are illegal, coercive measures. The UN General Assembly has repeatedly called on all countries to neither apply nor recognize unilateral coercive measures. Every year since 1992, the UN has condemned the U.S. blockade of Cuba. The 120 member-states in the Non-Aligned Movement have condemned sanctions on Venezuela.

North koreaUnited statesCape verdeNorth koreanMun chol myongAlex saabStansfield smithJamie dimonMeng wanzhouCounterintelligence divisionSchiller instituteUnited nationsAfrican bar associationEconomic community of west african statesUs sanctions violate international lawViolate international law

The Failure of Trump s Coup : A Victory for the US Empire

but the Left gets on their bandwagon by Stansfield Smith / February 22nd, 2021 The Democrats’ second trial of Trump ends like the first: the outcome known in advance, the entire process designed to sell to the anti-Trump masses that the Democrats were leading some progressive counter-attack. Both impeachments enabled these politicians to present a national diversion to avoid addressing real issues the US people suffer from: the pandemic, lack of vaccines, no national health care program, increasing homelessness, closed schools. The Democrats’ first impeachment over Trump’s phone call to Ukraine aimed to sully his name for the benefit of the 2020 Democratic presidential campaign. They purposely did not address Trump’s actual crimes: his cruelty to Latino immigrants on the border, his indifference to police abuse of Blacks and Latinos, his racist attacks on non-white US citizens and residents, his neglect of the threat of global warming, funding the genocidal war against

United statesDonald trumpNancy pelosiScott ritterGlenn greenwaldJoe bidenProtectourdemocracy followthefactsStephen cohenVladimir putinHillary clintonBernie sandersStansfield smithKamala harrisSenior researchElectoral collegeDemocratic party

What the US Constitution Specifies about Choosing the New President

may choose to enforce state laws that bind Electors to voting for the winner of the state’s popular vote. The Supreme Court recognized that “such promises of candidates for the Electoral College are legally unenforceable because violative of an assumed constitutional freedom of the Elector under the Constitution, Art. II, section 1, to vote as he may choose in the Electoral College,” but added “it would not follow that the requirement of a pledge is unconstitutional.” Electors not Voting as Pledged As of 2020, only 33 states and the District of Columbia have laws requiring Electors to vote for the candidate they pledged to vote for. However, in half of these jurisdictions no legal mechanism enforces this. Only 14 of the 50 states have voided votes contrary to the pledge their Electors and replaced the respective Electors. In two of these states they may also be fined. Three other states impose a penalty on “faithless” Electors but still count their votes as cast.

United statesDistrict of columbiaSouth carolinaDonald trumpGeorgew bushGreg palastRutherfordb hayesSamuel tildenFareed zakariaHillary clintonStansfield smithElectors for the electoral collegeConstitution grants full authorityCouncil on hemispheric affairsSupreme courtSenior research

What the US Constitution Specifies about Choosing the New President, How it is Stacked against the People

What the US Constitution Specifies about Choosing the New President, How it is Stacked against the People
pressenza.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from pressenza.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.

United statesDistrict of columbiaEl salvadorSouth carolinaNorth koreaThe coronaNorth koreansStan smithDonald trumpGeorgew bushGreg palastRutherfordb hayesSamuel tildenFareed zakariaHillary clintonStansfield smith