consequences for those of earth are the result of a legitimate 2020 election victory. that investigation appears to be accelerating. according to investigators also stole self funds from trump advisers. look. federal agents boris epstein, an in-house counsel who helped to coordinate trump s legal effort and mike lowman, a campaign strategist who is the delay director of election day operations for the trump campaign in 2020. all of that is a big deal. the justice department is reportedly obtaining search warrants to seize cell phones of trump allies, featuring lots of subpoenas. as of last week. now, we have less than 60 days to the election. less than two months to the midterms where the department has long term standing practice of not taking public
potential future case, plus put investigators in jeopardy or expose potential witnesses to pressure. there s also the long standing practice at the justice department to not say anything about pending cases, especially ones as politically sensitive as this. that said, as the judge in the case recognized, there s public interest involved here. cnn s jessica schneider starts us off. do we know why exactly the judge decided to release this? we don t know for sure, anderson, but it s possible that the doj may have given a little more than they originally thought they could. the judge moved really swiftly today. it was less than four hours after he received prosecutors proposed redactions that he ruled that what they proposed would in fact be sufficient and should be released to the public by noon tomorrow. the reason it s interesting that this judge came to such a quick conclusion is that when doj argued in court last week, they said that any redactions could be so extensive that it wou
believe the evidence supported the maximum possible $75 million that the plaintiffs initially asked for. the jurors did have a lot to consider including the question of whether the l.a. sheriff s department and the l.a. county fire department lacked the proper training and policies that caused the violation of the plaintiffs rights. they also had to consider whether they had a long standing widespread practice or custom of taking illicit photos of victims bodies. they all found in the plaf plaintiffs favor except that they found that the fire department did not have that long standing practice. but otherwise they found in favor of bryant and chester. i can t imagine how painful it was for those families to have to go through all this, but how brave of them. to keep fighting through it, yeah. ahead carol maloney voted
the photos of the victims to, quote, try to impress a woman at a bar. bragging about how he had been at the crash site. and the photos being shared with firefighters at a gala event at the universal city hilton hotel. the county contends legitimate reasons for first responders to take and receive the photos, including to help determine the size of the crash site and decide what resources were needed. it claims that all images were deleted upon orders of superior officers. they no longer exist in any form and were never intended to enter the public domain or appear on the internet. but as the la times reports, an expert witness who testified last week for bryant and chester said the behavior of the deputies and jordan were examples of macabre long standing practice in law enforcement of taking and sharing gruesome photos especially when celebrities are involved. pretty horrible stuff, right? but why do people want to see such images? joining me now is kolton skriber in, ph.d. from the
so senator cotton is asking the justice to clarify what s happening by 3:00 p.m. tomorrow, in a letter to the attorney general writes this, refusal to represent the deputy marshals would violate the long standing practice not to mention its moral duty to defend law enforcement officers when they are sued for actions in the line of duty. rich. rich: sandra, major tension over border patrol agents and the agency s leadership in a meeting in laredo, texas on friday. i ve been doing this job what s that? for good men to do nothing. that s what s happening here. good men are doing nothing. allowing illegally aliens. you are doing something. no, sir, we re not. that tense exchange comes as the migrant surge continues. one mayor in arizona is declaring an emergency. william is in yuma with more.