the former president s finances. according to notes that evan corcoran took of his conversations with his client, donald trump, the former president, wanted to fight the subpoena that demanded that he return classified documents that he had no right to have after his time in office. now, these notes taken by corcoran are providing more insight into trump s thinking and his actions around the time the criminal investigation was launched. and now they sit in the hands of a special counsel, jack smith. joining us now is john dean. he was the white house counsel for richard nixon. and just like evan corcoran, john, you testified about your conversations with president nixon. so, as you listen to what has been reported here, in your mind, why would there even be dozens of pages of documents, notes, about what to do with a lawful subpoena? shouldn t that conversation between attorney and client be pretty short? well, you i know mr. trump in the past said he was surprised his whit
at four. but chocolate is my favorite, so this is a poll that i really do believe in. i am. thank you very much. news continues, cnn primetime starts now. anderson, thank you very much. good evening everyone. tonight, two notable developments in the special counsel s investigation of donald trump, including word of yet another subpoena involving the former president s finances. according to notes that evan corcoran took of his conversations with his client, donald trump, the former president, wanted to fight the subpoena that it demanded that he returned classified documents that he had no right to have after his time in office. these notes taken by cochrane are providing more insight into trump s thinking and his actions around the time that criminal investigation was launched. and now, they sit in the hands of the special counsel, jack smith. joining us now is john dean, he was the white house counsel for richard nixon, and just like evan corcoran, john, you testified abo
women, and it becomes comical. strategically ignorant. that s a great phrase. this sounds like what so many companies try to do on the cheat, this is force people to go to a session. that s the first problem. and then making them sort of go through a process that doesn t necessarily have a lot of science behind it. if people aren t confident in the process and they feel like they re checking a box and they re there against their will and it s not clear what the outcome is supposed to be, you ve set yourself up for misunderstanding, which is what they achieved here, and not the diversity and inclusion they sought to do. you can t do it on the cheap. it takes years. there are corporations out there that have had long standing mentorship programs, deep conversations with the leadership of the company, which is really where the change has to start. and it takes a generation before you xerox, i remember writing about stuff in the 80s. they had a great diversity program for mid level ma
there are plenty of examples of corporations that are out there that have had long standing mentorship programs, deep conversations with the actual leadership of the company, which is where the change has to start. and it takes a generation before you, with xerox, i remember writing about stuff in the 80s. they had this great diversity program for mid level managers. years later, ursula burns, a product of that environment who grew up and the housing products and your city, become ceo of a fortune 500 company. it can t be done but it s not done overnight and it s not done in cutesy sessions that don t have a lot of times by part of this is there are so many attacks on what you are talking about. those initiatives that were born out of here is of research, borne out of the fact that racism is real in this country are being devalued as everybody is just being canceled when actually, these companies do need to deal with racism. certainly trying to avoid looking at you, you are a black