Officers, of citizens, complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, th
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, you just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they
Complaints, is that correct . And real estate. Somebody said real estate. Okay. No. The original proposal, if i may madame president , had both the office of labor standards and enforcement nocc under the public advocate, the amendment made in committee was actually with respect to both offices not have them been under public advocate, but to have the public advocate appoint the heads so the officers, were not moved under public advocate, actually, the public advocate had the ability to appoint. So that was different. But you didnt pull them out, u just changed it . I dont understand the question. For some reason, i was under the impression for example, office of citizens, complaints, was removed from public advocate in committee, and now placed back in but in a different form. What happened in committee is the way the olsc and the occ were left after i amended. After the committee made the other amendments, is those 2 offices were not under public advocate, they remained where they we
Will use it. He said, i am going on the stage, i have 7000 people out there. He loves to talk about the thousands of people waiting to see them see him. He did mention to be on the phone, did you see the such and such poll, i am only down by 2. All the other polls show him down by much more. I met him many months ago. I was one of the first reporters to profile him because i usually see usually profile ceos and billionaires. Day, when everybody wasnt trying to reach them, i was able to reach them. He clearly is under the gun. He has got to do something and he has got to do it fast. I think the dealmaker in him ws, when the lands gape when the landscape is changing come i have to change the deal. What are you hearing about the party and how they are trying to keep up . There are a lot of folks around washington, people involved, who are starting to say, what do we need to do to save the house and Senate Majorities . That is becoming a bigger and bigger concern. Republicans are saying th
Issues before the meeting today and we would have gladly pulled this aside. It was not brought to the attention of the chairman. I know you want to Say Something commissioner. Commissioner narasaki i just want to note that the commissioners are all well aware of which state advisory and needs are open recruitment. My staff and i have gone out of our way to help as much as the staff to identify people. I have to say that not every commissioner is doing that, so one of the problems we have, as knows,ioner heriot well we have a large number of stated by three committees who are open and not feel and we need to get them done because as we just heard from the report today, they play a very important role. So staff is doing the best they can to try to get these slates up and running. Awould be happy to entertain waiver of our rules to go back and add some people, if there are some qualified people to some of these slates, but we need to start getting some of these slate done. As the chair ha