investigation. looking at videos they have seen from the classrooms and the bit that i ve had privy to is not of the carnage but the initial l entrance of law enforcement in the building and the standstill. at that point, we wait an hour, an hour plus. you said the stand still on the stand off. ? stand off. did they pull back when they should have gone forward from what you ve seen? an active shooter situation, i ve every law enforcement officer and expert in san antonio where i live and throughout this district, you go in. that didn t happen here. i don t want to monday morning quarterback this thing but we have to find out for the future so this never happens again. what kind of failures happened. i feel in this situation, standing back was not the thing to do. your expert suggested the same
agenda is that investment in people rather than just buildings and bricks and mortar. is it rather than just buildings and bricks and mortar. bricks and mortar. is it your judgment bricks and mortar. is it your judgment that bricks and mortar. is it your judgment that this - bricks and mortar. is it your judgment that this is - bricks and mortar. is it your judgment that this is a - bricks and mortar. is it your i judgment that this is a queen bricks and mortar. is it your - judgment that this is a queen speech that envisages another two to two and a half years before there s a general election? general election? plenty na but standin: general election? plenty na but standing back general election? plenty na but standing back and general election? plenty na but standing back and looking - general election? plenty na but standing back and looking at. general election? plenty na but standing back and looking at it, | general election? plenty na but. standing back and looking at
our correspondent, guy de launey is in belgrade and has more now on the reaction from there. outrage that s where we re at here in serbia. and we re hearing outrage both on a sporting front and on a diplomatic front. so, on the sporting front, a nice little pithy quote from the serbian tennis federation, who said that preventing novak djokovic from playing was unacceptable for the entire sports world on the planet and contradicts the sacred olympic principles, which are well known. i must admit, i ve forgotten which the sacred olympic principles are to which they re referring, but i ll take their word for it. but there s also been a lot of political reaction now. the leaders of serbia s political. their political leaders, the government, have been quite quiet in the days running up to the ministerial intervention. i think they were hoping that, by standing back, they wouldn t do novak djokovic s case any harm. now, though, they ve come out all guns blazing, with president aleksanda
and fight for his title, or he gets to leave the country and be deported. our correspondent, guy de launey, is in belgrade and has more now on reaction from there. outrage, that s where we re at here in serbia. and we re hearing outrage both on a sporting front and on a diplomatic front. so, on the sporting front, a nice little pithy quote from the serbian tennis federation, who said that preventing novak djokovic from playing was unacceptable for the entire sports world on the planet and contradicts the sacred olympic principles, which are well known. i must admit, i ve forgotten which the sacred olympic principles are to which they re referring, but i ll take their word for it. but there s also been a lot of political reaction, now. the leaders of serbia s political. their political leaders, the government, have been quite quiet in the days running up to the ministerial intervention. i think they were hoping that by standing back,
i must admit, i ve forgotten which the sacred olympic principles are to which they re referring, but i ll take their word for it. but there s also been a lot of political reaction now. the leaders of serbia s political. their political leaders, the government, have been quite quiet in the days running up to the ministerial intervention. i think they were hoping that, by standing back, they wouldn t do novak djokovic s case any harm. now, though, they ve come out all guns blazing, with president aleksandar vucic blazing in particular, asking, why do you mistreat him? why do you harass him as well as his family and a nation that is free and proud? so this is now being very much cast here in serbia as an attack, notjust on one man, but on the entire serbian people. earlier, i spoke to immigration lawyer daniel estrin. he told me what both sides will have to prove in court tomorrow. it s a remarkable turn of events, really. the minister s decision was based on vastly different reasons.