there s multiple thoughts. one of it that, and just like the zimmerman case, they didn t actually pursue stand your ground, but when the judge gives the jury the instructions, they give instructions that sound like they are saying because it s self-defense. if you find he had the right, he didn t have to retreat. so sounds like stand up to stad is in the case. the other thing is premeditation. it goes back to what lawyerslash law school. and jurors get cob fused by it. what s premeditation? doesn t have to be, did he think about it for hours. premeditation can be folder in a second but the jury could have gotten confused. they need to poll the jurors. in many parts of the country, the states say, you have a duty if you can to retreat and end this conflict, but in florida in the infinite wiz dom of the florida judicial system, now in