those four are allowed to disclose the information that was received from stormy daniels, and daniels will not be penalized if they do so as long as daniels did not inspire them provoke them or make them say what they have to say. there s not as much of a muzzle on them as donald trump would like to have. there s two phrases, follow the money and timing is everything. really, if i m nervous, if i m donald trump, i m nervous. i m nervous because there s so many opportunities for the discovery process through investigations and litigation to bring out the truth and expose all the correspondence, documents and evidence in this case. including pictures, photographic evidence. jill, the other reason that donald trump may be nervous, he s mad at sarah huckabee sanders for saying too much maybe. this is sarah huckabee sanders
information on paternity information, not limited to trump s children, allegedly trump s children or alleged children or alleged sexual partnersment are ment partners. are we overreading that to mean that ms. daniels may have issue to paternity? any great lawyer will want to draft an agreement with broad language. but it s peculiar to include the phrase paternity information. why would that be a relevantment in to a settlement agreement unless it was an issue. if you follow the settlement agreement and talk about disclosure issues there are four people identified to whom stan ye stormy daniels has disclosed this information to, and one of those names is angel ryan, gloria allread d is her lawyer.
contribution, something to get donald trump elected and then not telling the truth about that? that s kind of the subject of the special counsel investigation. let s go to lisa bloom, member of the california bar. stormy daniels/lisa clifford is saying that cohen es septembsen freed her to talk about trump by disclosing information about her and in his own words deciding on his own to gift her with $130,000 to supposedly make her not talk, but then trying to enforce an agreement not to talk about donald trump. does any of this make sense? have you ever heard of a case like this where a lawyer supposedly on their own decided to use their own money to pay for a hush agreement? there s a couple different issues here. i have a lot of women coming to me right now as part of the me too movement who signed mda s and want to get out of it. when the other side talked, i made the same argument. it s not fair, it s not right, it s not just for one side to
talking about the attorney for stormy daniels, and using the word arbitration. take a listen. look, the president has addressed these directly and made very well clear that none of these allegations are true. this case has already been won in arbitration. i like ms. sanders, i think she has a near impossible job. any claim by the administration that donald trump won in arbitration is no different than me claiming that i won the super bowl a few weeks ago. it s complete hooey. even if it s complete hooey, why is sarah huckabee sanders proactively talking about arbitration with somebody that donald trump is claiming he never had sexual relationship with. clearly she made a very big mistake. if he says he s not part of this at all, if his lawyers are lying and saying he s not part of it, why was he the beneficiary of a resolution in an arbitration?
that was a big mistake. i think we have to look at a few other things, why is donald trump treating stormy daniels differently than the 18 other women who brought nonconsensual claims against him? he has not said anything as negative about her and has not attacked her, which suggests to me she does have something serious in terms of evidence against him. that s what we should be looking at, as well as remembering that this is hush money. hush money is part of a coverup. that s what an obstruction of justice is. that s what gets presidents in trouble. it s one of the major things that brought down president nixon, paying hush money to keep the defendants from telling the truth about who had hired them. i think there s a lot here to be uncovered yet. on that point, lisa, you represented many women who made these claims against powerful