an administration. i want to know about that. if the president is speaking to somebody not in the administration, there s no executive privilege? no. yes, you re correct the way you said it. executive privilege is supposed to be very narrow even within the executive branch. it s not any conversation between the president and anyone. it s supposed to be about regarding national security. now to extend it to people not in the executive branch takes it outside of all boundaries. and the thing that s interesting about lewandowski, he invoked this yesterday but not across the board. sometimes he said the white house has instructed me, and stams he answered openly. the only thing that made any sense of that, do i think this is good for trump or bad? he seemed to invoke it at times when he didn t answer the question. not necessarily in cases where it involved conversations they claimed were protected. sometimes even on things that are written in the mueller report, he did not want to an
findings. new immigrants remain twice as likely to live in poverty as natives. newwi immigrants on medicaid increased by 11%. the share of new immigrants on householdcr receiving food stams tripled from 2007, to 2017. the phrase new immigrants are people in the united states for five years or less. the critics will say, well, you know you re using an appropriate controlssi thecateo institute criticizing thehe study that you exaggerate the cost of immigrant welfare that was from last year or two years ago, but they will say that. that s right. one of the interesting things. immigrants coming much more educated it used to be a third of the people in the united states for five years or less, used to be the case, about a third had a college dedegree. now it is about half, so we thought that if immigrants became more educated they would do a a lot better. but, in fact what we found is there is still about as likely to live in poverty the new rivalsov and welfare rates have
take very concerted efforts to destabilize the situation. and so as both steve and nada have indicated, this is part of that playbook and the president has artfully in front of a huge audience, by the way, he made these stams at a press conference in st. petersburg against the backdrop of the st. petersburg international economic forum which is the annual event in which russia makes a sort of state of the russian economy address invites foreign investors to invest in their economy and to buy into the putin narrative. so in effect, i say this as an affront. i say this far from being a kind of admission or compromise, i see it as a direct challenge to our president and i don t think it should go unanswered. i think it s high time that president trump stop equivocating about whether he thinks that russia interfered with our election and that he
a hell of a pinpoint operation. he s basically suggesting a pinpoint operation that it s not effective that they re killing a lot of civilians and chris wallace asked him about it. did he tip his hand? was that an intentional thing? who s to say it was intentional? but what it seems to show is that kerry is imputing by his sarcastic statement that there s some sort of blood lust on behalf of the israeli defense force is that it s a hell of a pinpoint operation when said sarcastically means they re doing the opposite engaged in indiscriminate attacks and not doing everything they have to do. what does that tell you about his state of mind? about the administration s state of mind? there s been a lot of interesting stams coming out of this administration. kerry also said it s important hamas steps up and be reasonable and understand you need to save lives. and what it shows to me is that kerry has a fundamental misunderstanding of the motive of hamas, a terrorist organization whose
a hell of a pinpoint operation. he s basically suggesting a pinpoint operation that it s not effective that they re killing a lot of civilians and chris wallace asked him about it. did he tip his hand? was that an intentional thing? who s to say it was intentional? but what it seems to show is that kerry is imputing by his sarcastic statement that there s some sort of blood lust on behalf of the israeli defense force is that it s a hell of a pinpoint operation when said sarcastically means they re doing the opposite engaged in indiscriminate attacks and not doing everything they have to do. what does that tell you about his state of mind? about the administration s state of mind? there s been a lot of interesting stams coming out of this administration. kerry also said it s important hamas steps up and be reasonable and understand you need to save lives. and what it shows to me is that kerry has a fundamental misunderstanding of the motive of hamas, a terrorist