When it comes to those that are spending 10 thousand or less it is perfectly understanding with. 3 percent of the totem spending why you wouldnt audit any. I worry about the message that sends. We are saying if you spend 10 thousand of less you have zero risk if you misspent the funds and not sure that is the message we want to send. Even if it is a rel tivly token percentage at least it sends a message there is some risk that fraudulent reporting would be caught and fined by the commission. My other concern, when it comes to the audit i think a lot of that depends on how quickly you can ge through them. One thing im concerned is lets make sure we do them faster and if people dont comply we should hold it against them and not wait for them to give materials. If you tell me it is lot faster than the past then what you suggested makes sense. If it is about the same speed than we run the risk where candidates who lose dont have a vested interest complying and may be long gone by the time
Showing high injury the multiple high injury that is again be the baseline were tracking to show us where were making progress and well talk about this when we get into the strategy update but it is important that were tracking outcomes vision zero is about outcomes not the pcos or dollars we put in but how many lives we save and towards vision zero youll look at the evaluation through that lens well talk about later on policies we did a good job to coordinate the policies well have control over again by the commitment we got from the board of supervisors and from our own leadership that is important probation officer to look outdoor and upward at the state level to look at the laws that might be holding us back if vision zero from safety enforcement to look at whether or not we should drop some programs for 25 miles to 20 there are issues weve got get to later i want to talk about the delivery of the projects something i know has been a concern for the public and for commissioners ove
Tracking outcomes vision zero is about outcomes not the pcos or dollars we put in but how many lives we save and towards vision zero youll look at the evaluation through that lens well talk about later on policies we did a good job to coordinate the policies well have control over again by the commitment we got from the board of supervisors and from our own leadership that is important probation officer to look outdoor and upward at the state level to look at the laws that might be holding us back if vision zero from safety enforcement to look at whether or not we should drop some programs for 25 miles to 20 there are issues weve got get to later i want to talk about the delivery of the projects something i know has been a concern for the public and for commissioners over the last year so what i want to emphasize a lot of has changed in the rifrp between sfmta and the partnering agencies that help us with vision zero vision zero nodes those more than you know more than the board wouldn
Could get a copy of that slides or additional slides okay sorry about that well make sure that you get a copy. Im sorry go to the next one. I think that is it also i know that we are weve got a question from the members of the public but im interested in looking at how prop a and b will help us deliver on vision zero amongst the other priorities that sfmta the kind of thinking with the department with the passage of those two measures. Thats a go question i think there are two parts to the answer one is that that broadens the base for projects close to half of the money is available under a prop a is going to go towards projects under the vision zero umbrella with the high network so obviously the most important russels roles is to provide the source and were committed to help with this vision zero strategy other important thing that the prop a does it gives us the ability to you know bring on specialized staff necessary to move across jurisdictions and agencies to do Initiative Things
Us where were making progress and well talk about this when we get into the strategy update but it is important that were tracking outcomes vision zero is about outcomes not the pcos or dollars we put in but how many lives we save and towards vision zero youll look at the evaluation through that lens well talk about later on policies we did a good job to coordinate the policies well have control over again by the commitment we got from the board of supervisors and from our own leadership that is important probation officer to look outdoor and upward at the state level to look at the laws that might be holding us back if vision zero from safety enforcement to look at whether or not we should drop some programs for 25 miles to 20 there are issues weve got get to later i want to talk about the delivery of the projects something i know has been a concern for the public and for commissioners over the last year so what i want to emphasize a lot of has changed in the rifrp between sfmta and t