Understands upfront this is not going to be me. I want you to answer and give your views. I would say you represent probably about half the country, your view about hst other half represents mine. You agree . What kind of divided plus or. Minus . Certainly divided, yeah. Question i mea plun, you know, pol were polarized, were traumatized. We clearly are in thesares. And were in these echo chambers. I mean, lets be candid, john. I mean, you know, night your folks are watching you and getting a certain perspectivin r my folks are watching other networks getting shot. We have Studies Thatorks and sht of democrats watch me. Well, including me. So im actually im here for watc too. Oint, with the point, though, i think we need more of that crosspollinatiowen. Lariza we need more of these kind ofti conversations. And we need to not just, you know, accusing each other of misleading the American People, but i think confront each other in the context of Providinother Ong Opportunitiesm to addres
Yeah, its red meat thursday when we tell you what you already knew Tenursday W Te be true. And everyone who disagrees can go f themselves, to quote dana perino. Ugrino. Left fists are ugly. I. Fists are ugly. Youve seen the view. But now science is bearing it out. Its amazing. It begin ig it outs with a new t intelligence study out of denmark, which a Country Count benmark, which a Country Count prediclit persons political leanings with 61 accuracyons pol. And its based solelyd on their base. Ly oits far more accurate than the old method, which was based on asked sizmee. But when they judgede thes the facial features used to make these political predictions, they found something else. The right wingers were way hotter. You . Yes. S bu yeah, yeah, yeah. But with some notable exceptionse of course,e. He brought down the curv e. He but now heres the boring part. Danish scientist. So. The kind with cheese or fruit filling, they fed 3200 photos of political candidates into the eye tool to a