you have to believe rudy is looking over his shoulder to see if somebody might be coming for him. you heard all the testimony that took place this week. which one do you think had the greatest impact? you think altogether there are basically two narratives developing. the first one is that the career officials were being pushed out of the way in favor of individuals like guiliani who are taking over and conducting a kind of shadow foreign policy the second question, which i think there is less testimony on is a quid pro quo. that was sondland s testimony about the exchange of the meeting in washington, it was very valuable for president zelensky and his willingness to conduct this investigation into the bidens. so i m looking at those two narratives that are developing and looking forward to see how either or both of them develop next week. glen, i was talking with a congressman just yesterday from new york. he was saying he listened to sondland s testimony and thought he lied th
involved in a quid quo pro and take it back later. mr. mulvaney gave a confession. his confession was the confession of the president. msnbc news is confirming guiliani attempted to secure a visa for the man at the center of the fake bind ukraine conspiracy theory. msnbc says it is now expanding. i think this is dangerous precedent and it also is an insult to the fbi, the cia, the national security council, all of the other agencies. republicans in congress are still looking to protect the president from the consequences of his actions. even as a new puig survey shows a majority of the americans, 54% approve of the house decision to conduct an inquiry. after intense criticism, president trump has reversed his g7 decision, announcing last night he would know longer host
moderates off a cliff and forcing a tough vote at this moment. i don t blame the white house for having concerns. you have adam schiff holding interviews and testimony behind closed doors, so information is not out to the public. in a harris: ship, knew where that came from. he could holdings meetings and hearings behind closed doors so information doesn t surface and selectively putting certain information out there, like the text mess annuals. look at vel relevant information, the transcript is in the conversation or close enough to a transcript out to the public for all to see. if you look at text mess annuals that surfaced, sondland said he believes that bill taylor was incorrect and president has been crystal clear, no quid quo pro. kurt volker told congress in opening statement reiterated multiple times there was no mention of joe biden and an investigation into him and
are a lot of other things going on and b, it just all gets so tedious that the american public kind of looks away. one reasona they like this, they thought it was easy to explain. he was on the call and asks for quid quo pro, he should go and but when you can t carry that theme any longer and other things happen, americans are like, ah, i really need help with my healthcare. harris: so obfuscate. i learned to say. sounded beautiful. harris: thank you. part is separate from the attack, president comes out on white house lawn and talks for 45 minutes to reporters and muddys waters for democrats. then he says words like witchhunt, puts things in category that can become the attack, but now democrats instead of saying this is our next step and impeachment, got to fight that way and come out and fight that wave. you get the last word with
investigation. the special counsel s office has stated no more indictments. no more indictments in the special counsel s report. are we sure they have not that s a great point. they definitely passed on investigations. i think a couple of investigations to watch. obviously what s happening in new york as it relates to the trump inaugural. the second watch is the certain individuals in the trump organization that s ongoing there. we still have this idea of official straw donations and actually a person has been charged and pleaded guilty with arranging straw donations into the trump inaugural. that s a case out of washington, d.c. that i think you were alluding to. and that investigation is ongoing. whether or not the trump inaugural committee knew about that. that s a big question. we ll have to see more about that. and then there s some additional investigations and some other questions from other trials. for instance, a bank that was involved with paul manafort an idea of qui