than we on the outside seeing it as being. they haven t found the weapon. the two witnesses to it, their credibility will be questioned. there s five gun charges against him with regard to the murder. he faces about 29 years for that time. if they can t prove the murder case, the gun case may put him away. he may end up more aggressively fighting the gun case than the murder? absolutely. don t you think the video is pretty powerful. absolutely. the fact he destroyed a lot of the evidence is powerful. circumstantial evidence, there s nothing direct. whereas in the gun case, as paul said, if you bring in all the different witnesses and give them the squeeze job, could you get really strong evidence. is it an even better squeeze job when it s your friend sfoosed so just some other player. absolutely. by the way, i think the murder case is probably very strong, but massachusetts authorities would proceed against a gun running case anyway as guns get into the state, it s very, v
too. sunny just said you don t subpoena people at the center typically of an investigation like that. is this a squeeze job? you generally don t. you re probably looking at him as a material witness. he went to the university of florida with hernandez. they had been associated for a long time, and this gun running investigation has a lot of links back to florida. and the university of florida. so it doesn t surprise me that his former college fellow players might somehow be brought into the investigation. and heather, what do you think about the notion that at a time when aaron hernandez has to aggressively defend himself against a murder charge and another investigation of other crimes that s ongoing, as well, do you even bother at this point with the gun running or do you just wait that out and let me clear the more important one that could put me away for life or is it all one and the same? i think it s all together. the murder case may be weaker