closet at the time. but was she? the prosecution was about to unveil a stunning theory. how sandra pulled off an elaborate and deadly hoax. here s dennis murphy with the conclusion of unspeakable . sandra melgar s defense attorneys had try to portray the murder investigation as seriously flawed. but, perhaps their most persuasive argument was sandra herself. she didn t testify. but houston chronicle reporter brian rogers said her muted appeared spoke volumes. there s an old adage indefensible if you can make your client look like a school mom, do it. and she kind of come so cross that. we kind of? frail small. you have a hard time believing she could even yell. much less stab anyone. and how could that seem petite women have managed, as the prosecution contended, to which nature beneath the doorknob of the closet that she was already inside? and beyond that, find her own
Ein Punkt war drin: TSG Balingen unterliegt dem Regionalliga-Tabellenführer SC Freiburg 2
zak.de - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from zak.de Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
it from the bench which spoke volumes. this dissenting opinion, i have encouraged people to read it, people what maybe don t understand what s at stake with gerrymandering. this is a powerful and important opinion and decision that will shape the course of america in democracy. justice roberts admits that partisan gerrymanderers produce an unjust result but he also said the federal courts have no role in fixing this, which leaves it to who, the state legislatures that are actually gerrymander gerrymandered? if the state courts have to manage it, why can t the federal court manage it? they asked this question, is this how american democracy is supposed to work? she lays out the facts that are at issue in this case. in north carolina in 2012, even though republicans had less than 50% of the statewide vote, they won 9 of the 13 seats in the
it would seem that if they had weeks to prepare for your arrival, they would have improved the situation there somewhat. one would think. but i have to tell you this. it also left us wondering what are we not seeing? i ll give you an example. there were some children what we asked to see we were told they were sick, suffering from a cold or the flu. we said well, we d like to see those children. we want to talk to them and find out what their experiences are. we were told that they were confined to an area that they called something similar to a sick ward and because of that we were told it s not safe for us to see them. and we thought, well, those are the children we really want to see, because if what we re witnessing with the children you are producing is matted hair, stinch in their clothing. if it s crying children, what in the world might we witness if we got to see the children in the sick ward. just the fact that there was a sick ward with so many children who were ill, that