interest that we re talking about extends to her? i have to confess i have haven t read the spifs i can case you are referring to. if i understand the question you were posing, it sounds as though the state is seeking to regulate for a child that has been born that was injured while inside the womb. i think that we are not denying that a state has an interest there. not denying a state has an interest here, either. roe says states have an interest. with respect to this specific right to abortion there are also profound liberty interests of the woman on the other side of the scale and not being forced to continue with a pregnancy or forced to endure childbirth and to have a child in the world. the state s arguments seem to ask the court to look only at its interests and ignore the weighty interests of the woman on the other side. justice gorsuch, anything further? i want to make sure i understand your response to the
0 decisis analysis and i want to give you an opportunity to respond. the undue burden test is not at issue. that applies to regulations, not prohibitions. the state has conceded this is a prohibition. thats the title of this law is an act to prohibit abortion after 15 weeks and the only thing that is at issue in this case is the viability line. the viability line has been workable. the lower federal courts have applied it uniformly for 50 years, the fifth circuit had no difficulty striking down this law unanimously 3-0. it has been an exceedingly workable standard. if i may return to your question, a reasonable possibility standard would not be workable. it would boil down to an argument that states can prohibit a category of women from exercising their constitutional right merely because of the number of people in the category and that is not how constitutional rights work. a state would never say it could ban religious services on a wednesday evening for example because most people
part the data collected will give the public a snapshot into whether the incidents exist at a particular school or district and whether they re meeting their obligations to comply with the civil rights law we enforce. our proposal for the 2021 crdc would eliminate duplication and we welcome comments from members of the public. after receiving this statement i went back to the education department to ask more about duplicated data asking why the department wouldn t want all the data possible and yet to hear a spifs i can response to that query. to be clear this is a proposal. not set in stone. deals with just removing allegations. i m told there will be a 60 day public review period. anyone in the country can submit a comment in favor or against the proposal. benjamin. benjamin: thanks, david. julie: experts predicting a surge in online shopping this black friday. the big question is, will shoppers get their orders on
i have to tell you the inability of afghan security forces to defend their country has played a very powerful role in what we ve seen over the last few weeks. the fact is we invested the international community invested over 20 years, billions of dollars in those forces. that s just not what president biden said. he said the afghan military outnumber the taliban. they had u.s. training. they had u.s. equipment. they would be fine. that s turning out not to be the case. bill: thank you, peter doocy from the north lawn. back to you momentarily. dana: let s bring in general jack keane. instead of having you a spifs i can question i would like to the night to process all we saw yesterday. he were on the air yesterday giving your thoughts how do you feel this morning after seeing that c-17 trying to take off from the kabul airport. it is heartbreaking to watch something like that and you can t help but make the
withholding china accountable but that might be the best place to start. it would be a great place the start. he will meet with our allies in europe. a lot of them have economic interests tied up in china. but also europe is starting to get tired of china as well. they signed a trade deal with china at the end of last year. they ve stopped the implementation of it in part because of china s gross human rights abuses against its own people. this really is a right time to bring our allies along with us in isolating china and imposing real consequences on them for unleashing this plague on the world. bill: i want to take you back a year and a half. a series of media takes going after you. you were quite public on the possibility of this early on. listen to this and a very spifs i can question for you to follow. watch. senator tom cotton suggested that the virus may have come from china s biological warfare program. very dangerous to stir up suspicion, rumors and spread them among