central television. it means that npfrr is not thate different from the tehran times ,with the exception, ofhappen course, being lessed accurate and more anti-american. yo so that happened on tuesday. why are we telling you. chan abt with all the momentous changes underway around the world, whyy would we open a showab with a story about twittergorizing categorizing npr as state media will ? because it s true. reaso that s the reason.n. finally, thankfully, somebodyd in authority has told the truth about something and that is thrilling to see on its own terms. in a world defined by lies froms our leaders. this seemedig like a rare sis of hope and progress. up telling the truth is the mostms revolutionary act of all, far more than taking up arms. and yet you rarely see it. human beings created language or to describe the world around them more precisely than they could with , say, grunting sign language. ng o beeurnn evly, we have national publi own creatioern ever since, b
your mind that this was state a media? not at all.ll my our mutual buddy the chris plante calls a national panhandler radio, appropriately npr. and yor radiaru know what s amag about this? they re trying to prove thatd they re not state media by and they re relying on everyone defes funded by the state in order to make that defense. prs so karine jean-pierre stands there at the white house press briefing and say briefins npr ie independent, she gives a braveheart style speect styleh attesting to their independence. do you think she would ever do s that for simon atibaim? like, not in a million years. not in a million years. of course, it s for npr. npr cited yul roth, the former head of censorship twitter,affii as a guy who saidat m they shouldn t be labeled state affiliatededia media. dollars yo, roth and twitter atfedera the time were making millions of dollars from the federal government to censor the american public. these are all completely biased people. and one last big thing