Put it, many in the media badly screw up when it came to that terrible bombing of the Hospital Grounds in gaza city. New york times, and the paper was not alone, ran this Banner Headline israeli strike kills hundreds in hospital, palestinians say. At least theres that attribution, but that really means hamas said it. The Terrorist Group that controls the gaza government with, that launched the war with unspeakable atrocities, that that has a long history of deception. Well, it turns out the accusation wasnt true. Israel never targeted the hospital. What sense would that make in its hamas that carries out massacres. Israeli intelligence said it was an errant rocket fired if from within gaza by the Palestinian Islamic jihad, and President Biden backed that up citing pentagon intelligence. Based on what ive seen, it appears as though it was done by the other team, not you. Howard israels channel 12 the later showed video of a rocket being launched near the hospital and the explosion outsi
show me the carfax. start your used car search at the all-new carfax.com. new reaction to john kerry s speech on israel and a future of a two-state solution. a spokesman for british prime minister theresa may rebuked kerry for his criticism of israeli settlements on palestinian territory. joining me is nairi huff, former state department spokesperson. i understand you worked under john kerry and hillary clinton, correct? i did, betty. you have interesting perspective. let s get right to it. may s spokesperson said that we do not believe that the way to negotiate peace is by focusing only on one issue and we do not believe that it is appropriate to attack the composition of the democratically elected government of an ally. so what is your response to that criticism of kerry? well, very interesting that you see that the british voted
netanyahu. frankly, he s disagreed with the approach since before the joint plan of action the first interim agreement reached with iran. but what will say that prime minister netanyahu with as we re saying to our gulf partners we re making a nuclear deal. it s the right thing to do and the best thing to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon for the longest period of time. at the same time we re not at all headsening our concern about iran s destabilizing the threat toward israel and other partners. we can have a dialogue about what else can we be doing to reassure you our commitment. we re going to be very very vigilant and confronting other iranian actions in the region that concern us. and for now the republicans by and large seem opposed. what are you going to do to try to get it through congress because otherwise there s no deal well first of all, we re going to lay out the details of
palestinians. you got you got a lot of pushback on that. you re back at it. you went and gave a speech. here is my view on that fareed. i think the two-state solution is critical to israel s future. i don t i think it s future is going to be extraordinary difficult for israel if they can t find a way to get to a secure peace with the palestinians. because i think it s going to be very hard to maintain both her jewish character and her democratic character as long as she continues to stay in occupation. the demographics i think, will overwhelm it. one of the guys at the time while you were secretary of state criticized you for that speech was bb netanyahu. he didn t. that wasn t my problem with him at the time. my problem at the time he was a deputy foreign minister of