class= nosel > and of course, he s trying to become president of america again and the other is about the business models of news, because they are under ever more pressure. and when it comes to the business model, we are also looking at al and journalism, because several news organisations have done recent deals with the big tech firms. so that is all coming up. on this week s programme, we re going to hearfrom andrew neil, who has a brand new show on times radio. he s also the chairman of the spectator group. and we rejoined by caroline waterston, the relatively new editor in chief of the daily mirror. yeah, we ve also got two guests coming out of the states one, katie notopoulos, who s the senior tech and business correspondent at business insider. but the first person we spoke to isjeffrey goldberg, who is editor in chief of the atlantic. and we started off by asking him just to sum up what the atlantic is. how is that even possible? on the rare. just in case people do
brady who is right next to him, sits in the lords as a tory peer. what aboutjeremy clarkson when he was presenting? andrew neil, who i think is one of the best political presenters in the country, but he is chair of the spectator group and makes no bones about his conservative support. so all these people, i ve in response to a complaint a couple of years ago about andrew neil to the bbc saying he has his own personal twitter account and what he says that twitter account is up to him. i think that s the right approach, within reason. bear with me, because i need to quickly say goodbye to viewers watching on bbc world around the world, thank you for watching. sorry, world around the world, thank you forwatching. sorry, i world around the world, thank you for watching. sorry, ijust world around the world, thank you forwatching. sorry, ijust had world around the world, thank you for watching. sorry, ijust had to do that. just on that point, talking about richard sharp, who we have talked
did he directly say he should consider his position? it said he had a significant error ofjudgment and it said he should consider its impact. consider its impact. reading between the lines and i ve appeared in front of select committees and read a lot of reports and it is pretty clear what they were suggesting. this has been a big part of the problem because at the same time as talking about gary lineker, everyone else is saying, well, what about lord sugar presenting the apprentice? karren brady who is right next to him, sits in the lords as a tory peer. what aboutjeremy clarkson when he was presenting? andrew neil, who i think is one of the best political presenters in the country, but he is chair of the spectator group and makes no bones about his conservative support. so all these people, i ve actually seen a letter in response to a complaint a couple of years ago about andrew neil
that was just last month. i think the problem is, and i support it. did he directly say he should consider his position? it said he had a significant error ofjudgment and it said he should consider its impact. consider its impact. reading between the lines and i ve appeared in front of select committees and read a lot of reports and it is pretty clear what they were suggesting. this has been a big part of the problem because at the same time as talking about gary lineker, everyone else is saying, well, what about lord sugar presenting the apprentice? karren brady who is right next to him, sits in the lords as a tory peer. what aboutjeremy clarkson when he was presenting? andrew neil, who i think is one of the best political presenters in the country, but he is chair of the spectator group and makes no bones about his conservative support. so all these people, i ve actually seen a letter