it because you days dad ran the place and you did not want to make him mad .e and en you might wind up likelike t the members of his personal soccer team who dared to miss spenalty kicks. that s what third world countries are like. all citizens are not equal inver countries like that. power derives from proximityom to power. op that meansle in the second mosh powerful people in a countryftee like that are the children ofan the president. and very oftenar they don t have jobs and are addicted to something. that s the way it works in places like that. and for a long time, that system seemed very foreign to most americans. they were used to living in a democracy. they could barely even imagine it. but then during the last presidential campaign, joe biden s daughter abandoned her diary somehow in a house she was staying at in florida after she got oun t of rehab. t diary, ashley biden recounted how her father had taken showers with her when shew was young and she attriter.
75 witnesses, 800 photographs and exhibits but yet as you mentioned the jury needed less than three hours to reach its vertex. the state versus richard alexander murdaugh defendant indictment for murder guilty, guilty, indictment for possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, guilty, guilty. reporter: alex murdaugh was immediately handcuffed and led from the court. no obvious signs of emotion on his face. as he contemplated the reality that the jury simply did not buy his excuses for the initially lying to the police about his whereabouts and movements on the night is why and youngest son were shot to death. murdaugh was portrayed as a serial liar by the prosecution who painstakingly went through murdaugh s long history of stealing millions of dollars from his law partners and from his clients and the attorney said if marc spent so much of his life telling lies, the jury should conclude he was lying again now. and to emphasize that point, they showed
himself. quote, no one s going to believe it was a suicide bomber. suide.t to his chief of staf f. there will be conspiracyrett theories all over the place. now,response it s a pretty odd e if you think about it at the time. there is no way that bill barrew could have known for sure how jeffrey epstein died.ncern so you would think as the attorney general, his first conceroun would be finding out what actually happened, but instead, his first concern waseu worry that the public mightto jump to unapproved conclusions d. not belhappene and in some ways, bob barr was right to worry. many americans did notth believr that jeffrey epstein had killedc himself. he was ge strange circumstanceus of his death. stranger even the most a people understood at the time ustainedit was going to takeconn a sustained public relations campaign to convince americans that jeffrey epstein killed th himself. but bill barr was willinghe fle to make the effort. two days later, he flew to new orle
they say? what s their response? they they say that there s no national security concern. they ve told us that they have properly vetted the fufu corporation and they see no problem with it, which just simply isn t true. well, just two months ago, we again sounded the alarm after the committee on foreign investment said it didn t have jurisdiction to block this mill s construction. let me put this very bluntly. the committee that congress mandated and gave the authority to protect america s national security is allowing a chinese business with ties to beijing. that means the ccp to operate mere miles from an american military installation. was general austin. how about meely? well, tonight, after months of pressure, the ap is reporting just hours ago that the u.s. air force has now told north dakota leaders that full fang s plans do pose a significant threat to national security, prompting city officials to say they ll move to stop the project once and for all. we re
and he did it without the help of anyone.s ad none of his advisors wanteviserg to use on foreign policy. i policyp to b desperately wanted trump to be quiet, bute n trump wouldn t. what s the point of nato ?t nat he asked nearly thirty years y after the fall of the soviet aft union, no one in washington could answer him. p racist shut up. racist, they replied. but trump just kept going in. his trump way. russia, why would we fight russia? he wondered.e wouldn t making russia our our enemy just drive putin into the arms of china? inand create the most powerful and dangerous anti-american bloc in history? no one bothered to answerbody him. in fact, for the sin of asking,y they called him a traitorch to his country.ed him for they impeached him for it. it se ind then they started a war with putin. but in retrospect, trump asked a deeply patriotic question.ue if russista everion. joined fors with china, american global hegemony, its power would end instantly. you d have the w