for president, potentially against donald trump, i think it makes it more difficult. now look, the justice department will say we are going to look at the facts, all of the evidence and whatever. but i do think that that is a huge issue in question here. how will the public look at this? it seems like from all of the very and clear timelines that we have presented, been presented on january 6th, whether we are talking about the fulton county investigation or looking at who is getting subpoenas and the special counsel s, examination of trump s role on january 6th, that feels like it is down the line. that mar-a-lago felt for a moment like it was gaining steam, in terms of potential criminal indictment. january 6th, when you talk about the gravity of what we are talking about, it seems more plausible for criminal indictment. but the crime timeline on that scene seems like the distant future on the horizon. i think that you can see something sooner rather than later. they have this re
but when that happens after that is quite different. in fact, there are significant legal implications as the two special counsel s, what each of them has been assigned to look at. give me said it happens enough that there is a term called spillage, what if anything needs to change or have been, does it change or process? i am worried that the processes that govern the departure of the administration either are not being followed to their letter or are perhaps gaps in these processes. i ve suggested that a team of experts from the intel community, from the national archive, the office of management and budget, the pentagon, bring these experts together, review the process that exists, and make recommendations so we can lower the risk. we can never elevate the risk, but let s lower the risk based on places they should be. charlie savage, larry fiver, my thanks to both of you. i m going to bring in
rival. the perceived conflict of interest that garland could not overcome. so, is merrick garland letting donald trump dictate the terms of these investigations? i think mark arland would say, is he s following the regulations that are before him, as the attorney general. so, as you see the statute, that oversees special counsel s, they re overseeing conditions that need to be met for the attorney general to appoint a special counsel. one is a conflict of interest for the department to, and to is that it is in the public interest. he found that both of those things were met in this instance, in part, because we are not talking about president biden s political rival in, an upcoming presidential election. one of the questions before the justice department, speaks directly to the legitimacy of the 2020 election, in which biden, and trump, fought very hard for a win. as we know, president biden won, and president trump s continued to say, that was an illegitimate
general, merrick garland, as long said that the justice department could handle any investigation of former president, donald trump, by strictly following the rule of law. trump upended garland s approach by, formally, announcing his 2024 right house run. the ongoing investigation was recast as an investigation by president biden s justice department into a top political rival. the perceived conflict of interest that garland could not overcome. so, is merrick garland letting donald trump dictate the terms of these investigations? i think mark arland would say, is he s following the regulations that are before him, as the attorney general. so, as you see the statute, that oversees special counsel s, they re overseeing conditions that need to be met for the attorney general to appoint a special counsel. one is a conflict of interest for the department to, and to is that it is in the public interest. he found that both of those things were met in this instance, in part, because we
tucker: holy smokes. what a fun hour that was. hope you enjoyed it. wewe did. tune in every night at 8:00 to the show that is the sworn enemy of lying, pomposity, smugness, andhe groupthink. we ll be back tomorrow, the next night, and forever more. for now, sean hannity from new york city from new york city. sean: tucker, great show. we have a great show. the president s attorney, rudy giuliani, is in the studio for an inclusive interview. the deep state is working to malign and destroy the presidency of donald trump, the person duly elected by you, the american people. tonight, we will break down exactly why ever to occur tiered justice system is targeting this administration. we will show you the extreme measures that robert mueller is taking and others are taking to delegitimize this president and everyone who supports him. breaking tonight, president trump is now beefing up his legal team in order to navigate the special counsel s, well, off the rails investigation. in my opini