Underway in a matter of hours and while donald trump himself is not expected to attend, his behavior will be at the center of things, because judge Tanya Chutkan will hear arguments about are opposed protective order that would limit what trump can do with the evidence. The judge will consider those arguments while she is surrounded physically by u. S. Marshals. That new Security Detail was retained after the former president complained about her on his social media site. A sad State Of Affairs to see the judge have to be a full time Security Detail. Nbc news reported this was spotted even if she was inside her own courthouse grabbing coffee in the cafeteria. Thats where we are today, and look, we have to extend the threat concern to of Course Witnesses who are already being targeted by trump and his cohorts in the prosecutors, of course, and the jury, of course, the many jurors, all of this in a high threat environment. Complained about her, more like railed against her and a reminder
Half of his campaign. His allies relay around him, and some ways they are ramping up the two defendants. They are saying that donald trump cant get a fair trial in dc. Of course is being have held here in a left leaning city. They refer to it as the swamp. In florida, the trial will take place there. Florida is his home state. Its one that he won twice in the last two president ial elections. The former president is facing four federal criminal charges in this indictment, including Conspiracy To Defraud the United States, conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding, obstruction of and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding, and conspiracy against the rights of citizens. The indictment also mentions six alleged co conspirators, but none of them have been charged. The group, includes four attorneys, a former Department Ofjustice official and a political consultant, that allegedly aided trumps criminal efforts. Analysts believe they are former Trump Lawyers rudy giuliani, john ea
it for us tonight. we ll see you again tomorrow. time for the last word. my friend jonathan capehart, in for lawrence tonight. good evening, john. good evening, ali. thank you very much have a good evening. thank you. last night on this program, a large breaking news that special counsel jack smith and his team had handed over the first batch of evidence in the classified documents case. today, we, along with donald trump and his legal team are getting a better idea of what that evidence actually is. according to the filing of special counsel smith and his prosecutors, that evidence includes quote, interviews of defendant trump conducted by non government entities recorded with his consent and obtained by the special counsel s office during the investigation of this case, including the july 21st, 2021 reported interview defending trump providing to a publisher and writer quoted in part in the indictment. now, we cannot say for sure whether that line refers to more priv
complained about her, more like railed against her and a reminder, she was confirmed to the bench unanimously. meanwhile, the special counsel s office has proposed january 2nd, 2024, as a trial date in the case, though some experts think that might be a little optimistic. this is the special counsel right out of the box saying we are ready on january 2nd, so now when the defense comes back with, we ll be ready on january 2nd 2025, the judge is going to balance the scale. and then come up with a more reasonable time period. trump s team has one week to respond, then judge chutkan will set an official trial date before the end of this month. down in the state of florida trump and his co defendant, walt nauta, pleaded not guilty today to additional charges in the classified documents case. carlos de oliveira, the other codefendant, was unable to enter a plea.
return fewer boxes after the fbi left. so, that s a clear indication of a president who has a difficulty following his lawyers advice, particularly when he thinks his self interest. when he thinks his self-interest. .. when he thinks his self-interest. , . ., , self-interest. .. just curious, as one of self-interest. .. just curious, as one of his self-interest. .. just curious, as one of his former - self-interest. .. just curious, | as one of his former lawyers, how do you deal with at a situation like that? i’m how do you deal with at a situation like that? i m not one of his situation like that? i m not one of his former- situation like that? i m not one of his former lawyers, | situation like that? i m not| one of his former lawyers, i never represented him personally. my allegiance was to the constitution and the white house and the institution. he did have personal wells lawyers who worked on the matter i worked on, but there s a distinction between being white house