ryanair comes under fire for plans force its south african passengers to take an afrikaans language test. and, the makers of the latest movie blockbuster top gun: maverick find they have a need for speed , and a good lawyer, as they re sued for copyright infringement. welcome to our viewers on pbs in america and around the globe. borisjohnson has survived a vote of confidence in his leadership of the conservative party, although more than 40% of tory mps voted against him. he described the result as decisive, and his supporters have urged their colleagues to allow the government to push ahead with the running of the country. but one of mrjohnson s critics said it was a very bad result , and he would be surprised if he was still in downing street by the end of the autumn. our political editor, chris mason, has the story of the vote and the result. after months of awkward question for borisjohnson, weeks of mounting speculation and a day of intense public, sometimes angry,
for forcing its south african passengers to take an afrikaans language test before being allowed to board their flight. a top movie earning top dollar, but the makers of the latest blockbuster top gun: maverick are now in a fight for the profits, as they re sued for copyright infringement. and how a man and a tree written into plans for a great olympic garden near the eiffel tower in paris. welcome to our viewers on pbs in america and around the globe. borisjohnson has survived a vote of confidence in his leadership of the conservative party, although more than 40% of tory mps voted against him. he described the result as decisive . but one of mrjohnson s critics said it was a very bad result , and he would be surprised if mrjohnson was still in downing street by the end of the autumn. our political editor, chris mason, has the story of the vote, the result and the reaction. after months of awkward question for borisjohnson, weeks of mounting speculation and a day of inte
different story. is it something over which they can claim copyright really? paramount is saying it is not based on the original 1983 article that ehud yonay road. it is based on a sequel but you can travel down the history and they can argue the chain of title and derivative comes from this original source which is what the yonay estate is saying. paramount is also saying. paramount is also saying they did not need to license the rights to the article for the original movie. it is suggested by credit a story by credit. it it is suggested by credit a story by credit. it is suggested by credit a story by credit. it feels like we are at story by credit. it feels like we are at the story by credit. it feels like we are at the sparring - story by credit. it feels like | we are at the sparring stage and by putting out there cases. what is the result going to be?
they did not even need to license the rights to the original article for the original movie, and only gave yonay suggested by credit, not a story by credit. so that is another interesting twist. right, it feels like we are at the sparring stage at the moment, they are both putting out their case here. drawing on all your experience and expertise, what is the result going to be? i mean, the smart thing would be a settlement. like you said originally, there is plenty of money to go around tom cruise alone is expected to make $100 million on this movie from his residuals he has a very nice deal. but i think that right now paramount really wants to double down as a matter of principle and really believes that they have a strong case, that they have the rights or that they did not need the rights, so they are sort of doubling down right now. mitra ahouraian.