make sure there s no back sliding. when the first sovereignist party to be elected in 1976, it didn t come out of a vacuum. it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. 50 years from now, will people still be speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. because, in 95 this country came inches one being broken up. do you think it will ever happen? in the history of the world? i don t know, but i know one thing, everyone who says
sliding. when the first sovereignist party to be elected in 1976, it didn t come out of a vacuum. it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. 50 years from now, will people still be speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. because, in 95 this country came inches one being broken up. do you think it will ever happen? in the history of the world? i don t know, but i know one thing, everyone who says separatism is dead in this country and this province is a fool.
second class crap for much of history. i get it. i d be pissed, too. i would want my own thing and when i got it, i would want to make sure there s no back sliding. when the first sovereignist party to be elected in 1976, it didn t come out of a vacuum. it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. 50 years from now will people be speaking predominantly french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. right. and timing was never better than in the period 1990 1991- 82 because in 91 this country came inches from being broken up.
don t get me wrong. my last name is boudin, and i m normally sympathetic to the language laws. you don t think it s preposterous? i don t think think it is it s stupid, i agree with you completely this province 40 years ago was in some respects an english city, so we needed language laws for signage and stuff. signage, for instance, must by law be principally in french. french first in all things. but ever bureaucracy produces stupidity, and it will not assistant. the anglicans treated the french like second-class for much of the history. i get it. i would want my own thing and when i got it, i would want to make sure there s no back sliding. when the first sovereignist
i get it. i would want my own thing and make sure there s no backsliding. when the first sovereignist party to be elected in 1976, it didn t come out of a vacuum. it came from a couple decades of awakening and struggle. 50 years from now, will people still be speaking french in montreal? yes. no doubt about it. no doubt about it. french first is something most would agree with. how far and how rigorously you want to go with that? well do you think there was ever any possibility or real majority or plurality of quebecois that would have voted in separate nation status? in english, you guys say timing is everything. right. and timing was never better in the period 1990, 91, 92. in 95 this country came inches from being broken up. do you think it will ever happen in the history of the world? i don t know, but i know one