threatening legislationings to nullify them. markets seem to be relieved that the tariffs allowed for exempti exemptions. the head of the european participant is promising to respond firmly. china calls account tariffs a serious attack and south korea says it will respond, as well and that s really fascinating geopolitically because this came just a few hours after the south announced the united states/south korea talks. retaliation against u.s. goods is likely. u.s. farmers in particular could be collateral damage since america exports most of what it grows. president trump and the rest of the world heading in opposite directions on trade on thursday. 11 nations signed the trans-pacific partnership once thought to be dead after the president pulled the u.s. out of negotiations. the white house is seeking one-on-one trade deals. the president first with drew
reliability, the sushi chef whichever or dennis rodman. we ll save that for another conversation. thank you. let s see what you re saying. i think these are from facebook. what do we have, catherine? you re giving trump too much credit for north korea/south korea talks. trump is not that smart. he doesn t need to be smart. i think it begs the question, to be fair to the president, have those bellicose tweets of his caused certain such that they are having dialogue unlike anytime in the recent past? why else all of a sudden are they having conversation unifying their olympic teams and now saying that there will be a meeting between moon and kim? another one. what else do we have? do we really want a unified korea? wow. james, that is a great question. because who will be the dominant player militarily if in fact that comes to pass? what a great insight from you. still to come, lately both
whichever or dennis rodman. we ll save that for another conversation. thank you. let s see what you re saying. i think these are from facebook. what do we have? you re giving trump too much credit for north korea/south korea talks. trump is not that smart. he doesn t need to be smart. i think it begs the question, to be fair to the president, have those bellacose tweets of miss caused certain such that they are having dialogue unlike anytime in the recent past? why else all of a sudden are they having conversation unifying their olympic teams and now saying that there will be a meeting between moon and kim? another one. what else do we have? do we really want a unified korea? wow. james, that is a great question. because who will be the dominant player militarily if in fact that comes to pass? what a great insight from you.
tariffs but excluding canada and mexico in nafta negotiations could undercut that national security rationale. other countries can apply for exemptions. that didn t satisfy paul ryan. he is pushing back strongly against the tariffs and jeff flake is threatening legislation to nullify the tariff. markets seem relieved that tariffs allowed for exemptions. some talking about a suisse cheese kind of a trade policy that you know, blunts some of the president s biggest intentions here. there are still fears of a trade war. the head of the european participant promises attorney respond firmly. south korea says it will respond, as well. that s fascinating geopolitically. this came a few hours after the south announced the u.s./south korea talks. retaliation against u.s. goods is likely with many american industries caught in the crossfire. u.s. barbers in particular could