it s not a one size fits all coast to coast. the left doesn t want the voters to have a say and they don t care about facts or principles. for them, that leak of the draft opinion itself orchestrated and disseminated as it was, it s meant to terrorize. not to influence. think about this. why would someone leak a three month-old draft opinion that was in some form or another coming out in june anyway? tonight though given everything i ve seen, everything i know about the court and its inner workings from the time i clerked, i m doing to say i believe this leak was done with the goal of stoking violence against the conservative justices primarily on the court. in other words, the goal to force a change in the court i makeup before the november election. sounds nefarious. sounds like a totally horrifying
been pushing a theory that s false with no evidence for eight months, why aren t members of the all radical left destroy trump media, why aren t they worried about what is the real, alleged russian association? they re so worried about russia meddling in the election, isn t this far more worthy of an investigation? i wouldn t hold your breath. meanwhile, liberal lawmakers are now trying to impugn the character of the house intelligence committee chair, devin nunes. last week, democrats were outraged after the congressman announced he had briefed the popts new information he received that on new information he received that proved obama administration survailed president-elect trump and his transition team. on this program, chairman nunes said it was his duty inform the president. yesterday, democrats up in arms because they learned that nunes met his source on the white house grounds. all right, sounds nefarious. not really. congressman nunes said he did it in order to be near a secu