the constitution and rewrites it as if he s a one-man constitution convention. it s tyranny and i hear talk about the politics, is it a tax, is it punishment. let s call it a cucumber. pretend it s a cucumber. the fact is what roberts did and the four leftists with him is concoct and argument and rewrite the constitution, rewrite the statute and now we have obama care. here s the problem, even if we we peel obama care, how do we repeal the decision and shut the door he flung over to the enormous power the government will have against the individual. neil: what s interesting, we can get into the mechanics of how he limited two attacks to keep it within congress, stuff you re more aware of and on top of than i will ever be but the point that he might have switched sides and justice kennedy tried to get
him back, that shows the court might be more focused on optics than we know. sounds like kennedy was focused on the constitution and i think the chief was focused on optics. every indication is from jan crawford, even more that that, people used to reading opinions can see how the four descenters were furious. i mentioned this on friday, i have no inside information but you could tell they are furious because they were they thought he was playing optics and he was. neil: you were on this before anyone. it struck me, what did you know? we only got indications of this ourselves in the last 24 hours, so my hat s off to you. but i want to know what you make you know how the court arrives at decisions. i can t imagine this is the first time it s concerned about appearances. it hasn t. this is why the court doesn t deserve the reverence it gets.