testimony. which i m not permitted to do. story about this. a story that involves abuse of some of the president s allies have now publicly power and involves the president attacked the character, question placing hit own political the patriotism of lieutenant interests over the interest of colonel vindman. after watching him testify today the country and what is significant about the statement and you watched him for hours, is that it doesn t line up with what is your response to those gordon sondland s testimony. attacks? vindman said he warned gordon well, it is disgusting and it sondland or confronted him but is certainly a sign of desperation that they can t deal with the substance, their fiona hill also confronted him. gordon sondland testified that process arguments are now mooted he nobody ever raised concerns with him. and they have very little to so this is also going to provide say. they strike me as people who are a reason for the house to desperate to find something
do we know a timeline on that at all? i think they want to do it fairly soon. the most important thing that has to happen is classified information review. they have to take out anything that s classified. but it s not a grand jury. that shouldn t be all that difficult. david gergen, do you see the white house suddenly deciding to try the stop morrison from testifying? i think they ll do everything they can to stop him. his testimony is significant, anderson, because taylor delivered this blockbuster testimony, but it s very much in conflict with sondland. and they need to call sondland back, and then we re going have a comparison between the two. and to have morrison come in behind this and say taylor s got the right version here of the truth will really help to bolster the credibility and diminish the force of republican anti-arguments saying taylor, it s all secondhand, it doesn t matter, it doesn t mean anything. morrison is really critical, as we ve just heard in that 15-p