the supreme court s six three decision striking down the use of racial preferences in college admissions. biden was sentpreferen out by wr winds him up to lie. aff affirmative action is so s misunderstood. many people wrongly believe that affirmative action allows unequal white students, unqualified students to be admitted ahead of qualifie d. this is not this is not how college admissions work. now, the white house comms people aren t that ignorant.w th they know the truth that the entire point of preferences is to give minority candidates an edg me, regardless ofheir their test scores or the transcripts, or resume trani it s classic discrimination and it s based on race. colleges set out standards for admission and every student, every student has to meet those standards. meeand only that after firstmen meeting, the qualifications required by the school to college forget other factors. in additio other factorsn to thh such as race. okaasy what s less believablb that h
their admissions processes. for examplt e. to what what the court decided to do, i think, is really importan ist note. it decided to say thaty th actually the constitution. is it says that this is illegal.al you can t do.. and by doing that, i think the court really elevated somethint realg important for al americans to take heed to. and that is, you know, from the founding of our country through,throug you know the civl war, through the second founding, through reconstruction to today, the constitution is enduring this idea. all people are created equal,t really mean something. and the courl peoplet was not interested in just punting this in an easy way by decidingin these cases. the civil rights law, which is very unambiguous and decided to reall decy down deep and sayi look, i know that there arere a lot of , you know, competing the arguments about what the originaleaning o meaning of theh amendment equal protection clause is. and you re goinclauseg to hen that from the dissenters