also kept a lid on that videoooe footage. and in in some cases, dojts did not share it with criminal defendants who d beeged onn chan on january six in violation of . their constitutional rights. so we felt it wa so we felt it c anrvice to bring what we could to you. there was no justificationd for keeping the secret any longer. a poand a powerful argument to e made that sunlight is always and everywhere. the best disinfectant. it and in fact, because it waso soe video evidence, it is to some extent self-explanatory. anyone could look at the tapapee and decide what he or she thinks of it.very c so the tape we showed lastlearla night indicated very clearlys et that capitol hill police in pro some cases escorted protestersha through the capitol as if they were giving a tour. they did that with jacob.sley translate the so-called q and uncommon ad qanot one poit they even tried to open locked doors on channelize behalf. beha he was sentenced to four years in prison for his cr
no the one was swayed by the tol sham that we saw from the january six committee. and so now, yes, you wouldof ele think a media would be curious,o about lots of elements of january six , like, you know, who plante dd bombs outside the dnc and the rnc and thees a massive security failures, wa, which wasnedyo actually was one of the elements of the januarcommiy six committee did look into, as we now know, but was keptthed out ofec the final report becaue they decided to make it allk ri about trump. you would think that maybeouor they d be curious or aabt leasta any rational person might be curious about wraps, which,ao you know, someonf e who wase a leader of the oath keepers and was buddies with stewartnlys rhodes and is the only persononn on video on january 5th night. and january 6th morning and january 6th morning encouraging people to go into the capitol. and he s gettingd he s glowinge profiles in the new york times,g like someone should say, whatno is going on ?in why is this ha
that prosecution, that conviction was overturneturneddo by the supreme court, nine to nothing. i mean, this is someonf e who iu you were trying to make it seem like this was above board, you really could not have done a worse job in picking someone. and stephen, speaking ofsome smith, days getting some early days of muehler vibes here. checherek us out. say that he s independent.rei he s a registeresteredd political independent, we are told, and we ll work thil s cask without fear or favor. he s not someone who s going to waste any time. to, bringing over these skill sideshows, given his skill tenat and tenacity. known fad he s known for being really fast and cutting to the chase. okay, the turtle neck doesn t help with credibility there. stephen , wasn t this reallyn predictabl te? s so oh, he s so skilled lawyer, so,n tenacious. and did did i hear mention that he s registered as an independenhat he st? unbelievable. i mean, look, laura ndent?, the bottom line is the