90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. But if we continue to provide power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. And, so, the fiscal plan for the pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6
Observation. I understand that there are many competing needs on your services. Yes. I would suggest that this is a program that while low in dollar amounts has generated an enormous amount of Community Support for all reasons that we talked about today. Street lights might be in that category as well. But if you look at all the different needs, i sub petctiontion this has from what the public understands of what youre able to provide, weve all seen the benefits of this and hopefully we can think about that as we consider our budget priorities. ~ suspect and with that i know supervisor tang has a few questions. Great. I just wanted to followup again about the California Solar Initiative. I do want to know and i think its great puc is really working on trying to identify additional Revenue Sources and all that, but it does seem like from a customer standpoint or a that Rebate Program is really a huge incentive. And, so, what are [speaker not understood] that puc is working on to connect
Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which would disrupt the water supply and a recently completed engineering study, though costs have gone upwards of 6 28 million ~. So, that, sir, is new, and i do understand that that would be a very surprising and large change. The Interconnection Agreement expiration, though costs have always been in our tenyear plan, but not to the recently filed and heightened levels by pg e, to ferc and cpuc. But lastly
Youre able to provide, weve all seen the benefits of this and hopefully we can think about that as we consider our budget priorities. ~ suspect and with that i know supervisor tang has a few questions. Great. I just wanted to followup again about the California Solar Initiative. I do want to know and i think its great puc is really working on trying to identify additional Revenue Sources and all that, but it does seem like from a customer standpoint or a that Rebate Program is really a huge incentive. And, so, what are [speaker not understood] that puc is working on to connect with some of the folks who are responsible for that program to say, well, you know, maybe we should continue this, bring it back up, just kind of want to know what the future of a Rebate Program might look like. So, we are active participants at the California Public Utilities Commission and we do regularly monitor legislation in sacramento and at the federal level that affect Energy Issues. With state of califor
From 5 million down to 2 million go solar sf, cut energy sufficiency, cut City Renewables on city buildings, 90 million, 30 million each from programs that we really want to do. But if we continue to provide power below cost, there just is not enough money to do all the things that are good and that we would want to do. And, so, the fiscal plan for the pucs power enterprise was balanced the last two. Previous to that it was not balanced and it showed a shortfall. But it did you point out that it is relatively straightforward if we dont have more revenues to pay for costs, we could only buy what we can afford to. So, here again now, we fast forward two years three new pieces of information mean costs even larger than what we have ever assumed. Mountain tunnel was already in last years capital plan [speaker not understood]. It was in it for the last several as far as the maintenance work, but it was in at 100 million of cost. With the potential for collapse of the mountain tunnel which w