china supplies about 80% of north korea s oil needs. they shut that off and the economy effectively shuts down. china does not want regime collapse. they don t want refugees coming across the border and they don t want the geo political ramifications of putting an ally right at china s door accept. we re getting some initial analysis on this nuclear test that north korea carried out with satellite imagery and with the seismic data. analysts saying it appears there were a number of landslides at the nuclear testing site and there might have been a tunnel
land. i think he would realize why putting up such a fierce fight. we welcome president trump s visit to the sand kills. you have got to get the oil through those areas somehow. it s going to be on rail cars. and that s more ings dangerous than a pipeline. that is a false talking point that big oil loves to put out there. oil pipelines have less incidents but spill more oil and pollute for water supplies and railroads have more accidents but spill less oil. it depends on what you are looking a. for our purposes we think we have enough pipeline in ground to meet america s oil needs. the reality this pipeline has been and always basketball an exported pipeline in order to get the tar sands to the export market. we don t want it, don t need it and it s polluting our water supplies. jane, appreciate your time. thank you. thank you. up next, ben carson is one step closer to being donald trump s secretary of housing and
our ability to satisfy our own oil needs has incleesed. there s a lot of reasons, in my opinion, in my little war here, people don t want to do that again. at that time, it was the right thing to do. this time, i m going to disagree. that s going to be america s achilles heel, we have exhaustion and fatigue to fight our enemies. that s when they defeat us. are you saying you would have had americans stay in iraq all this time, is that what republicans think? i think it s really a disservice to be that simplistic in describing the situation. i m fine on going back and the people saying that bush was wrong. i disagree, but fine, let s just say that he was wrong, it was the wrong thing to do. then you inherit a situation that was actually pacified. you tell the american people that you will be safer now because we have succeeded in iraq. the generals tell them to keep more people in there in terms of boots on the ground, but also a lot more of the political solution, the diplomatic
our ability to satisfy our own oil needs has incleesed. there s a lot of reasons, in my opinion, in my little war here, people don t want to do that again. at that time, it was the right thing to do. this time, i m going to disagree. that s going to be america s achilles heel, we have exhaustion and fatigue to fight our enemies. that s when they defeat us. are you saying you would have had americans stay in iraq all this time, is that what republicans think? i think it s really a disservice to be that simplistic in describing the situation. i m fine on going back and the people saying that bush was wrong. i disagree, but fine, let s just say that he was wrong, it was the wrong thing to do. then you inherit a situation that was actually pacified. you tell the american people that you will be safer now because we have succeeded in iraq. the generals tell them to keep more people in there in terms of boots on the ground, but also a lot more of the political solution, the diplomatic
self-sufficient in our oil needs. we ll be part of the global marketplace. but imagine if it had four or five million more barrels a day from this hemisphere. then add the jobs. a million new jobs. tax revenue would boggle your mind. it s over 127 billion in new tax revenue. instead what is happening we re seeing this less production as we were talking about on federal lands, a lot less. just in the gulf of mexico, 230,000 barrels less production last year. that alone we could have $5 billion from the lost production we re having but instead. let s tax the industry more. we are heavily taxed industry. we don t have any subsidies. we re also hearing, let s rely more on brazil.