So i think that analysis is why. My piece is sort of in the same order. Its a significant enough question can they use a particular execution drug. It did give rise to a very interesting and bitter dispute between the five jusseses. But the fact that we have as we do periodically have senior more liberal justices say im not doing this any more, im not going to tinker with the machinery of zets any more is the more lasting piece of this particular decision. So i think thats something you want to put up why. And then why i endd with alito. I think the weight of the beast has to acknowledge what the majority is doing. In this case he said something quite succinct that moved off of description of the crimes for which these oklahoma inmates have been put on death row for. But as this illustrates theres no perfect ideal way to do it. Things are going to be slightly different. And most of us are in pretty much the same place. When i look at my story in the morning and davids story and bobs st
Ground but when you dont you have to sort that out politically i got elected to continue to do what i was doing the also to allow us to have enough time now all the states are emulating that around the country. [inaudible] [laughter] what is the question . [laughter] i am optimistic there is a growing consensus to push the views of the political system that people are getting free and frustrated that they see the need for a new message to go back to the place to be reform at the heart of what we believe and if you do that part then you will be carried by the American People not just one elected official. [laughter] we cannot wait until 2016 to change the direction of the country. It has to start now. [applause] one more question. I am a recent immigrant here. [applause] i am wondering what about the children of illegals . What about the finish there is education . Then they stay here or leave . Right now the law is the president doesnt have the executive power but it is unchallenged bu
Will examine them from a different perspective. About indian removal in the 19th century and how it was shaped by the expansion of american democracy and the cotton economy. Indian nations like the cherokees were victimized by the United States government, the state of georgia, settlers, but the nations willingness to adapt and to press all possible advantages illustrates how indians continued well beyond the colonial area to change to make colonialism work in their favor. Mind, i want to revisit california today. I want to consider the ways Californian Indian societies continued this practice and helped to build californias , attract settlers, and transform the territory into a vital american state during the gold rush. Hinged onformation the work of indian people. As you remember, catholic missionaries where the vanguard of Spanish Colonial settlement in california. Franciscan missionaries envision the Northern Frontier in which indians would be converted into spanish subjects and wi
California indians dont have the same kind of public image as say a warrior on a horseback, so they are not as bad ass in the popular imagination as the plains indians. I love this image because that guy is pretty fierce. He has some feathers going on. He looks like he could do some damage to your horse herd or to you, so i like that well into the gold rush era these mounted livestock rustlers in the Central Valley were kind of bad, bad, bad. Stock rustling also offered indians opportunities to thrive in the interior. Population explosion of horses. An english visitor estimated to see 3000 wild horses in todays travel in 1840. A miner on the eve of the gold rush claim that in the Central Valley, the Central Valley contained a larger portion of wild horses than any other part of the world to the same extent. On the san joaquin river, bands from 200 to 2000. These herds in addition to providing a lucrative source of trade provided a basis of subsistence for california indians living in t
Kath kathie mcmoore and working with them, we came up with some language that we drafted and submitted early on the Platform Committee for their consideration and thats the language that i have here today. It is very similar to what in the platform already. The draft platform so what i would do is simply there will be lines of 14 to 36. So there are three praragraphs. I would add in new texts of similar contexts but stating it differently. In working with these offices, there are words that we would like to use in terms of talking about peoples disabilities and the issues that we have been working on in washington dc to advance legislation. So thats the concept behind my amendment. It is not making any substantial changes. It is mostly a matter of wording and again, i happen to authorize and i have the support from three offices for my amendment. If you would like, it is difficult toll read on the screen. I will read it if folks would like. I think it is very strong language. The idea