china he is claiming that they were shared with the intelligence community. do you have any recollection in any way whatsoever that that information was shared with the intelligence community? again, to be clear, the idea that we would have been giving reassurance to china about our conduct at a point where we were concerned about china s interference in our election, this first phone call was reported to have taken place on october 30th, 2020. that simply did not happen. the phone call may have happened. but the i get that that was coordinated and shared and again, i was the head of the intelligence community. it would have prompted a very specific course of action involving both general milley and president trump because i frankly would have found it to be shocking and inappropriate and frankly unconstitutional and you have now heard the acting
president biden: i have great confidence in general milley. sean: tonight, we have come to. this sort of moral outrage from the electric depth safety and security of our federal citizens, got to be a full-scale investigation quickly commission formed immediately. here with more is an analyst gregg jarrett. a lot for you to chew on there. let s start with the legal side of this. if the book is accurate, milley should be relieved of military duties immediately pending a thorough investigation but i think your idea of a commission is an excellent idea. but under the uniform code of military justice, the militant would also conduct their own investigation by interviewing milley and others who may have been involved. if there is credible evidence. he should face a general court-martial for a variety of cards under the unitary they
president biden: i have great confidence in general milley. sean: tonight, we have come to expect this sort of moral outrage from the electric depth safety and security of our federal citizens, got to be a full-scale investigation quickly commission formed immediately. here with more is an analyst gregg jarrett. a lot for you to chew on there. let s start with the legal side of this. if the book is accurate, milley should be relieved of military duties immediately pending a thorough investigation but i think your idea of a commission is an excellent idea. but under the uniform code of military justice, the militant would also conduct their own investigation by interviewing milley and others who may have been involved. if there is credible evidence. he should face a general court-martial for a variety of cards under the unitary they
simply blackmailing biden into think it is okay. the postal workers don t need to get it. as long as you are in a union. you are okay. i think what you re seeing happen is in the end, as margaret thatcher tried to teach ask that socialism does not work. because you run out of the other people s money and nothing left to spend. so you have a whole system out there. why don t we release murderous? oh, the murder rate goes up. that is a big shock. i talked to somebody today we talked about the level of violence. that is a direct result of left-wing policies that favor criminals over the innocent. oh, why don t we told the russians, you get to build a pipeline and then we tell the americans, you don t get to build a pipeline. and we don t have any idea what that means. i think, it is not that biden is stupid. it is that biden and the team
china he is claiming that they were shared with the intelligence c community. do you have any recollection in any way whatsoever that that information was shared with the intelligence community? again, to be clear, the idea that we would have been giving reassurance to china about our conduct at a point where we were concerned about china s interference in our election, this first phone call was reported to have taken place onn october 30th, 2020. pthat simply did not happen. the phone call may have happened. but the i get that that was coordinated and shared and again, i was the head of the intelligence community.. it would have prompted a very specific course of action involving both general milley and president trump because ian frankly would have found it to be shocking and inappropriate and frankly unconstitutional and you have now heard the acting secretary of defense weigh in on