West Virginia Bill Looks to Censor Social Media Can the government regulate information shared by social media companies during an election? According to one West Virginia lawmaker, the answer is yes. The ACLU, however, says not so fast. Katya Maruri, Government Technology | April 20, 2021 | Analysis
A new West Virginia bill proposes regulations against censorship of information by social media companies during an election, with some “criminal and civil penalties depending on the nature of the violation.
Known as House Bill 3307, the legislation looks to create two things: 1) the Social Media Integrity and Anti-Corruption in Elections Act and 2) the Stop Social Media Censorship Act.
West Virginia Bill Looks to Censor Social Media governing.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from governing.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
West Virginia Bill Sets Sights on Social Media Censorship
Can the government regulate information shared by social media companies during an election? According to one West Virginia lawmaker, the answer is yes. The ACLU, however, says not so fast. Shutterstock/klevo
A new West Virginia bill proposes regulations against censorship of information by social media companies during an election, with some “criminal and civil penalties depending on the nature of the violation.
Known as House Bill 3307, the legislation looks to create two things: 1) the Social Media Integrity and Anti-Corruption in Elections Act and 2) the Stop Social Media Censorship Act.
The first act would require social media companies to make election-related content on their platforms transparent and provide political parties and candidates with equal opportunities to share information online without being affected by policy- or partisan-based censorship.
CHARLESTON What started out Wednesday as a debate on social media’s role in West Virginia elections turned into scrutiny of a member’s own social media
CHARLESTON What started out Wednesday as a debate on social media’s role in West Virginia elections turned into scrutiny of a member’s own social media